Cincinnati Bengals

Go Back   Cincinnati Bengals Message Boards - Forums > Cincinnati Bengals Football Discussion > Jungle Noise

Jungle Noise Bengals Football Discussion for BENGALS FANS ONLY. Visiting team fans please keep your postings in one of our other forums.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #26  
Old 05-05-2012, 04:07 PM
fozzie11 fozzie11 is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 282
Rep Points: 124
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

you guys keep saying that the ratings are off but, is this based on starters or just all NFL players? because if it is all NFL players then it is fairly accurate i mean starters on a playoff team should be rated above average.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 05-05-2012, 04:32 PM
BBlesmiley's Avatar
BBlesmiley BBlesmiley is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 720
Rep Points: 393
bengals Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

I think you were a bit harsh on the assitant coaches. They have much greater value than 4.5 and with Hue and M.Carrier joining the staff those are very solid additons. I would probably put the staff in the 7.0 range.
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 05-05-2012, 04:44 PM
kg221605 kg221605 is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 28
Rep Points: 2
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bryan View Post
It's hilarious that according to you Bernard Scott is better than both Leonard and Lawfirm. He needs his shot? 112 carries isn't enough? Did you miss where he averaged 3.4 yards a pop? He also caught 13 passes and gained a whopping 38 yards. Leonard on the other hand is very underutilized. He only ran 17 times but gained 85 yards which is 5 yards per carry. And caught 22 passes for 210 yards. This is the guy we should be utilizing more in a West Coast attack. Lawfirm wasn't great last year but he still out performed Scott. Can't we just say the Bernard Scott experiment wasn't fruitful and it's time to move on?
Those numbers are skewed because a lot of his carries came on third and long draws where the defense is fine with giving up the 8 and 9 yard carries. You give him 112 carries and i don't see him averaging much more than Scott.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 05-05-2012, 04:47 PM
busamboy's Avatar
busamboy busamboy is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: liberty township
Posts: 8,917
Rep Points: 40816
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett View Post
Every year, I do an annual article on my evaluation of our beloved cincinnati bengals. Agree, Disagree, hate me or love me, these are nothing but my opinion on our bengals, and we are all entitled to our own. This year I am adding A 1-10 scale of how I rate them, 10 of course being the highest

Ownership : 6.5
Mike Brown
Katie & Troy Blackburn

Mike Brown has either relinquished more control than we are aware of, or the old dog finally gets it. There is always room for improvement, but a 6.5 rating in my opinion, means he is above average here. 5.0 would be league average, so 6.5 means Mike Brown and the other ownership are doing a slightly better than average job. I guess a 9-7 record is slightly better than average too. Overall I think that we are headed in the right direction, lets just hope that by the time we get there the game hasn't evolved again and we get left behind.

Coaches :
Marvin lewis : 6.0
Mike Zimmer : 8.0
Jay Gruden : 7.5
Darrin Simmons : 6.0
Assistants : 4.5

Marvin Lewis : (6.0) is an above average coach. He scouts well, he drafts well, he has a decent vision on what a winning football team in the AFCN should consist of. What ML lacks is game day time management, playcalling and overriding his coordinators when they should be able to just do their job. Challenges are one of his weak points, he always seems to challenge the worst plays, and doesnt challenge the ones that need to be. ML is a decent coach, and honestly I would much rather keep him than let Mike Brown hire someone, his track record for hiring head coaches ain't so great, and I don't want to chance it. This is also ML's last year of his contract, so anything less than 8 wins, IMO, should warrant him being fired.

Mike Zimmer : (8.0) I know I will catch alot of flack for this, but I love what zimmer brings to this team. Some people love to forget how bad this team was with chuck breshnahan as our DC, and honestly we haven't gotten enough playmakers for zimmer in the years he hasn't had a top defense. Heck we had 1 CB who went down, and our defense still kept us in ALOT of games last year. Given a new rookie CB, and some new tools, Zimmer will post a top 10 defense for us again this year

Jay Gruden : (7.5) Let's all not annoint jay gruden the next bill walsh ok everyone? I know he is well liked by most fans, but lets remember that he took over for a guy we have all wanted gone forever. We got change, but he is by no means an offensive genius. I sure hope he improves this offense this year. We need a better rushing attack, and that should open up our play action and deep ball shots. I blame Benson for the complete lack of rushing attack, and I think most of us here who are sane can agree on that. Benson didn't even get a CALL from another team, but yet some people think he was still a great RB. I don't think the law firm is the answer though, and I sure hope when he falters the RB by committee can keep guys fresh and give us a more rounded attack.

Darrin Simmons : (6.0) I think simmons is only slightly above average, he does a decent job. I am glad we don't let special teams be a liability, and this is based solely on coaching. He has a good K and P to help him look good thats for sure. I don't think he is the next great special teams coach turned head coach (Harbaugh) or even will make it to a OC or DC job any time soon.

Assistant coaches : (4.5) Here is where I think we lack alot sometimes. We took some losses with Kevin Coyle getting a DC job, and some of our position coaches seem like they don't do a standout job alot of the time. Just a matter of opinion, but I ranked us slightly below average in this department.

Players

Offense : 6.5
Defense : 8.0
Special Teams : 9.0

QB :
Andy Dalton 7.0
A solid rookie, Dalton is an above average QB who can easily become great. He had a standout rookie year, doing better than palmer who went on to become a multiple pro bowler. Look for dalton to avoid the dreaded "sophmore slump" and continue to improve, throwing fewer interceptions and more TD's, and to get our playmakers like gresham more involved. His only draw back, is what john gruden said on his QB camp, sometimes dalton goes for the jugular instead of checking it down and taking what the defense gives him. I love the moxie and tenacity he brings, but sometimes you have to let the defense dictate what passes you can throw, to avoid sacks, interceptions, and ultimately lacking points on the board. His leadership, well we all know that is amazing.

Bruce Gradkowski : 4.0
Standard Backup grade. I love his ability to drive the team up the field in 2 minute drills as he has done so many times, as a comeback guy he is solid, now if only he could do that any other time in the game.....

HB :

Ben jarvis Green Ellis 6.0
Only slightly above average RB here. He has NEVER fumbled which is a HUGE plus, but I don't think he will do nearly as well behind our line as he did with the patriots. Belichick knows when someone is a system player, and I think he knew BJGE was replaceable by just about anyone. Lets hope we didn't get duped into the next matt cassel.

Bernard Scott : 6.5
I still think scott has done his time behind benson, and deserves the chance to compete for the starting role. He was given the backup job day 1, because the coaches saw something special, and he never really lost it. I think if BJGE struggles at ALL in the first 2 games, we all need to be chanting for scott, and get this kid on the field and see what he can do. He has ALOT of tread left on the tires, and lets hope he isn't too old and wasted away on the bench for us behind the terrible benson

Brian Leonard : 4.5
Great 3rd down back, but is getting older too. He is below average, lacks explosiveness and top end speed. Serviceable, and great for 3rd down. Can block well, but other than that not impressed with him as an every down back.

Rookies : 4.0
Let's let them get through training camp before we annoint anyone a bust or pro bowler guys :)

FB :
Chris Pressley : 6.5
The kid plays with a MEAN STREAK I absolutely love. He never shy's away from contact, and can definitely block. He lacks the ability to rush the ball, or catch out of the backfield, something you'd usually want in a west coach offense. Rated 6.5 as a BLOCKING FB only, and prob 2.5 as a receiving FB. In the role we use him, I gave him his role rating.

WR :
AJ GREEN : 8.5

AJ Green is the next megatron, I knew it from early in training camp, and so did the coaches. I knew coming out of college the kid was good, but DANG guys, if dalton and him get a full offseason to train together it might be scary how good these 2 can become.

Jordan Shipley : 6.5
Great slot receiver, not a burner, but a great route runner who can make plays. I think having him back will make a bigger impact on the offense's success than most realize.

Mohammed Sanu : 4.0?
Not a burner, but could be a great red zone target. Let's see in training camp.
Ya have to root for the kid after that prank call on draft day.

Armon Binns : 3.5
I'm sorry guys, but I cannot and will not appoint armon binns the next T.O. off a fluff article on the front page. If he was SO good as a few of us here have hyped him up, he would at LEAST been on the game day roster as active. I hope he turns out to be a great WR for us, but unfortunately I don't see him making any impact, it's hard to get WR's on the field for this team apparently.

Andrew Hawkins : 5.0
I love this kid, at first I thought he was too small to make an impact at WR, but every time the ball goes his way he catches it, and then the slippery little guy gets another 10 yards! Not to mention his value on special teams. Don't get me wrong he is a 3rd/4th receiver, but we could do ALOT worse at 4th/5th WR.

Brandon Tate : 2.5
No value as a receiver at all hardly, basically made the team as a returner and special teams guy. I'm not even overly impressed with his return abilities. I wouldnt be surprised to see him not make the team.

Ryan Whalen : 3.5
I think this kid can prosper, if he gets more reps and timing down with dalton. He isn't bad, and has shown some promise.

TE :
Jermaine Gresham : 8.0
Yes, I think if he got more balls thrown his way he could be a TOP TIER nfl receiving TE. The catch in baltimore last year made me see just how great of a receiver he is. I think dalton needs to rely on him more, and we can move the chains alot better if we do. His blocking is good, he can catch some great ones, and is a good route runner and fast for a TE to boot!

Orson Charles : 6.0
I think this kid will make the team as 2nd or 3rd TE easy. The fact he slid so far down in the draft amazes me. His talent is def there, now let's develop him and have a 2 TE attack we need!

Backups : 5.0
Average TE's, good blockers but average or subpar receivers. Good enough to play in the NFL as a backup of course

Tackle :

Andrew Whitworth : 7.75
Good run blocking ability for LT, and a pretty darn good pass protector. Whitworth is solid all around, and would be rated higher but he has costly false starts at key times more than I would like. Can't take this guy for granted thats for sure!

Andre Smith : 7.25
Andre Smith will have a breakout year at RT. Moving him from LT to RT to save $ was a dumb move, as I think whitworth and smith would both have benefited from switching positions from the get go. Anyhow, I think smith has a huge year, and gets a big contract. Now I just hope after this big year, he stays healthy and lives up to the money we will pay him.

Anthony Collins : 6.0
Not much of a drop off, this guy is a SOLID tackle in the NFL. He can play both sides, but is better suited as RT. Honestly, I like the guy, but let's face it, he is one of those guys who is almost a starter, but not quite a backup.

Dennis Roland : 4.0
Great run blocker, and great for the unbalanced line. Other than that, he struggles in pass protection. And for a guy who is 6"9 322, you'd think he would be a mauler who just dominated D lineman.

Guard :

Kevin Zeitler : 7.0
I am going out on a huge limb here, and i'm going to assume this guy has a dang good rookie year. Wisconsin seems to be a can't miss school as far as drafting linemen. Every year they put out a couple of NFL starters, and heck their RB's are never considered to be high picks because of them being a product of the system it seems. Zeitler is going to do a GREAT Job for us

Travelle Wharton : 6.0
My neighbor Kris Mick (subhouse contest champion 2011) played at south carolina with Wharton, or as they called him, Big Baby Vello.. From what he has told me, we have a starter in him, and he isn't a mauler type, but that the guy utilizes superior technique to beat his man, and rarely is a liability in pass protection. He isn't the BEST run blocker, but can def pull and kick out to get to his man. This is what i've been told, and he may be biased, so take it with a grain of salt.

Clint Boling : 6.0
I think wharton and boling battle our the 2nd starting guard job, and it's going to be close. Boling did OK last year, remember offensive line is about time to GEL with the other guys in the unit, and knowing your assignment. Boling was thrown into the fire so to speak, and did OK for what he was given to work with. I think after a year in the NFL system, he bulks up, gets stronger and is able to contribute more this year.

Other : 3.5
Our backups are nothing special

Center :
Kyle Cook : 6.5
I think cook is good, but he is by no means great. He does a good job, but I don't think he earned the big contract extension he got from our team. We are however, stuck with him, and I hope he continues to improve.
Does this book come in a hard copy? J/k I like how you threw article in the title. I might have to use that in the future if you don't mind. That way people can't get mad when I write a book for a thread.
__________________
Prove your doubters wrong Dalton, you will always be the Pro Bowler in my eyes.

Andy Dalton - Sports Science



The creation of a thousand forests is in one acorn.
– Ralph Waldo Emerson
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 05-05-2012, 05:37 PM
THE PISTONS THE PISTONS is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 8,206
Rep Points: 6589
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by BoboFett View Post
Guard :

Kevin Zeitler : 7.0
I am going out on a huge limb here, and i'm going to assume this guy has a dang good rookie year. Wisconsin seems to be a can't miss school as far as drafting linemen. Every year they put out a couple of NFL starters, and heck their RB's are never considered to be high picks because of them being a product of the system it seems. Zeitler is going to do a GREAT Job for us

Travelle Wharton : 6.0
My neighbor Kris Mick (subhouse contest champion 2011) played at south carolina with Wharton, or as they called him, Big Baby Vello.. From what he has told me, we have a starter in him, and he isn't a mauler type, but that the guy utilizes superior technique to beat his man, and rarely is a liability in pass protection. He isn't the BEST run blocker, but can def pull and kick out to get to his man. This is what i've been told, and he may be biased, so take it with a grain of salt.

Clint Boling : 6.0
I think wharton and boling battle our the 2nd starting guard job, and it's going to be close. Boling did OK last year, remember offensive line is about time to GEL with the other guys in the unit, and knowing your assignment. Boling was thrown into the fire so to speak, and did OK for what he was given to work with. I think after a year in the NFL system, he bulks up, gets stronger and is able to contribute more this year.

Other : 3.5
Our backups are nothing special

Center :
Kyle Cook : 6.5
I think cook is good, but he is by no means great. He does a good job, but I don't think he earned the big contract extension he got from our team. We are however, stuck with him, and I hope he continues to improve.
Clint Boling has to be the most overrated Bengals in the Forum. He got benched for poor play last year. Not saying he won't improve, but his play last year was probably a 3.
Reply With Quote
  #31  
Old 05-05-2012, 05:37 PM
Shake n Blake's Avatar
Shake n Blake Shake n Blake is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Homers gonna home
Posts: 9,648
Rep Points: 16543
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

Quote:
Ben jarvis Green Ellis 6.0
Only slightly above average RB here. He has NEVER fumbled which is a HUGE plus, but I don't think he will do nearly as well behind our line as he did with the patriots. Belichick knows when someone is a system player, and I think he knew BJGE was replaceable by just about anyone. Lets hope we didn't get duped into the next matt cassel.

I think you're being way too harsh on BJGE. The Pats would've brought him back, but we offered pretty good contract and more touches. The Pats drafted a pair of RB's high in last years draft, so they're stacked at RB. BJGE isn't being replaced by "anyone". He's being replaced by Shane Vereen (2nd rounder) and Stevan Ridley (3rd rounder). Also, I would argue that our o-line is every bit as good as the Pats' is now. We have no weak spots on the line.


Quote:
Bernard Scott : 6.5
I still think scott has done his time behind benson, and deserves the chance to compete for the starting role. He was given the backup job day 1, because the coaches saw something special, and he never really lost it. I think if BJGE struggles at ALL in the first 2 games, we all need to be chanting for scott, and get this kid on the field and see what he can do. He has ALOT of tread left on the tires, and lets hope he isn't too old and wasted away on the bench for us behind the terrible benson

No, he really doesn't. He'll be 29 this season. I don't care about lack of carries, you rarely see a 30 year old RB anymore, unless his name is Ladanian Tomlinson. You talk about Scott sitting behind the terrible Benson? In 2011, Benson averaged 3.9 per carry. Scott: 3.4 per carry. He finally got some big time opportunities last year and he failed to produce.


Quote:
Brian Leonard : 4.5
Great 3rd down back, but is getting older too. He is below average, lacks explosiveness and top end speed. Serviceable, and great for 3rd down. Can block well, but other than that not impressed with him as an every down back.

Leonard is exactly one week older than Scott, yet Scott has "plenty of tread" and Leonard is "aging"?


Quote:
WR :
AJ GREEN : 8.5

AJ Green is the next megatron, I knew it from early in training camp, and so did the coaches. I knew coming out of college the kid was good, but DANG guys, if dalton and him get a full offseason to train together it might be scary how good these 2 can become.
Agree 100%. I liked AJ from the start and he really delivered.

Quote:
Armon Binns : 3.5
I'm sorry guys, but I cannot and will not appoint armon binns the next T.O. off a fluff article on the front page. If he was SO good as a few of us here have hyped him up, he would at LEAST been on the game day roster as active. I hope he turns out to be a great WR for us, but unfortunately I don't see him making any impact, it's hard to get WR's on the field for this team apparently.

Agree 100%. The Binns compliments were a smokescreen. As you can see, we took a pair of WR's with quality picks.


Quote:
Andre Smith : 7.25
Andre Smith will have a breakout year at RT. Moving him from LT to RT to save $ was a dumb move, as I think whitworth and smith would both have benefited from switching positions from the get go. Anyhow, I think smith has a huge year, and gets a big contract. Now I just hope after this big year, he stays healthy and lives up to the money we will pay him.

I think Smith and Whit are best where they currently are. How did they save any money by moving Andre to RT when Whitworth is the better player??


Quote:
Anthony Collins : 6.0
Not much of a drop off, this guy is a SOLID tackle in the NFL. He can play both sides, but is better suited as RT. Honestly, I like the guy, but let's face it, he is one of those guys who is almost a starter, but not quite a backup.

I'm glad we have him, but let's be honest...he didn't generate much interest in FA.


Quote:
Kevin Zeitler : 7.0
I am going out on a huge limb here, and i'm going to assume this guy has a dang good rookie year. Wisconsin seems to be a can't miss school as far as drafting linemen. Every year they put out a couple of NFL starters, and heck their RB's are never considered to be high picks because of them being a product of the system it seems. Zeitler is going to do a GREAT Job for us

Agreed. I'm stoked about Zeitler, and I pretty much agree with everything I didn't highlight.
__________________
Offseason checklist:

1. Fire Paul Alexander [ ] didn't happen
2. Let Maualuga go, move Burfict to MLB [ ] didn't happen
3. Sign a veteran WR [ ]
4. Draft a speed back high [ x ]
5. Draft a SS high [ x ]
6. Drop Lawson, draft a replacement [ x ]
7. Draft a center and let him battle with Cook & Robinson [ ]
8. Let Clements go [ x ]
9. Bring back Andre Smith [ x ]
10. Bring back MJ (as long as he doesn't demand elite money) [ x ]

These things need to happen to take the next step

Last edited by Shake n Blake; 05-05-2012 at 05:41 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 05-09-2012, 04:21 PM
BoboFett BoboFett is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,104
Rep Points: 1200
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Shake n Blake View Post
I think you're being way too harsh on BJGE. The Pats would've brought him back, but we offered pretty good contract and more touches. The Pats drafted a pair of RB's high in last years draft, so they're stacked at RB. BJGE isn't being replaced by "anyone". He's being replaced by Shane Vereen (2nd rounder) and Stevan Ridley (3rd rounder). Also, I would argue that our o-line is every bit as good as the Pats' is now. We have no weak spots on the line.

I don't think so honestly. I think BJGE is an OK player who was a system guy. The pats plug in just about anyone at RB and do fine every year. Although us overpaying and offering more touches than the pats could be a very good reason he chose to come here.



No, he really doesn't. He'll be 29 this season. I don't care about lack of carries, you rarely see a 30 year old RB anymore, unless his name is Ladanian Tomlinson. You talk about Scott sitting behind the terrible Benson? In 2011, Benson averaged 3.9 per carry. Scott: 3.4 per carry. He finally got some big time opportunities last year and he failed to produce.

So scott had a down year... Nobody was going to do well behind that line last year, no matter what anyone says. Livings was prob the WORST LG in the NFL, Bobbie WIlliams age finally caught up with him, and this team just wasn't going to be successful running the football. Heck gruden knew it and quit trying to play ground and pound early on when he realized he couldn't bench benson, and benson wasn't going to give him decent production, or yards WHEN IT MATTERED. Scott has outperformed benson every other time before that. I also believe part of scotts YPC last year was because he was put into the game at bad times. Gruden started putting him in on 3rd and 2 at times, because he knew benson couldn't get the yards. Not sure why he thought scott would be better as a power runner be he tried it. Might be because benson was dancing behind the line, scott would pick his hole and hit it the best he could


Leonard is exactly one week older than Scott, yet Scott has "plenty of tread" and Leonard is "aging"?

Ok ya definitely got me here, For some reason I thought scott was younger than he is.

Agree 100%. I liked AJ from the start and he really delivered.

Yup


Agree 100%. The Binns compliments were a smokescreen. As you can see, we took a pair of WR's with quality picks.

Yeah I hate when hobson writes up a piece and everyone jumps on it like that player is the next pro bowler even though he hasnt done anything for us. Same thing happened with frostee rucker before too.

I think Smith and Whit are best where they currently are. How did they save any money by moving Andre to RT when Whitworth is the better player??

Because a LT gets paid more than a RT. The reason andre smith held out is because he wanted LT money instead of RT money, and katie wasn't having it. She said on hard knocks "we are offering him starting right tackle money". Smith played LT in college and they thought he should be paid as such.

I'm glad we have him, but let's be honest...he didn't generate much interest in FA.

True, but he can step in if theirs an injury without a huge dropoff

Agreed. I'm stoked about Zeitler, and I pretty much agree with everything I didn't highlight.

Why thank you sir! :)
....
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 05-09-2012, 11:10 PM
james1081c's Avatar
james1081c james1081c is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 774
Rep Points: 270
Default Re: Evaluating the Bengals from Top to Bottom (article)

They are a very talented young team from top to bottom. I think they definitely have all the personnel to go out and dominate teams. They just have to realize their potential. Despite what some people say, I believe they have very good coaching so they should be able to improve from last year. They have the best quality depth that I've ever seen a Bengals team have.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:32 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2012 Cincinnati Bengals. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate in any form without permission of the Cincinnati Bengals.