Wtf

[Carlos Spicyweiner]

What happened to my thread?

[Carlos Spicyweiner]

At least message me if your going to combine it.
Dang!

[AngryPanda]

This will not end well.

[Carlos Spicyweiner]

And it had nothing to do with "watching NO vs. Denver".
I worked last night. So I was not following the thread. And I don't understand what one has to do with the other. Read the titles!

[Ron Mexico]

Can you provide me a link to your thread? I would like to check it out.

[34inXXIII]

Originally Posted by Carlos Spicyweiner

And it had nothing to do with "watching NO vs. Denver".
I worked last night. So I was not following the thread. And I don't understand what one has to do with the other. Read the titles!

It's not always quite as simple as just reading thread titles. If we merely went by thread titles, we'd be getting even more complaints than we do now.

Here's the title & the entire opening post from the first (& current) thread:

Watchin the Denver vs New Orleans game...

We're not beating Denver, guys....
Denver is calling plays that get wide open against New Orleans, they're gonna do the same thing to us.

This is the title & opening lines of your thread:

Bengals vs. Broncos

How do the Bengals beat this team?
I NEVER go into a game thinking, there is no way they win this game.
But I gotta tell ya, I just don't see it.

I could be wrong, but it appears to me the context of both threads is identical: how unlikely it will be for the Bengals to beat the Broncos.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

It's not always quite as simple as just reading thread titles. If we merely went by thread titles, we'd be getting even more complaints than we do now.

Here's the title & the entire opening post from the first (& current) thread:

Watchin the Denver vs New Orleans game...

We're not beating Denver, guys....
Denver is calling plays that get wide open against New Orleans, they're gonna do the same thing to us.

This is the title & opening lines of your thread:

Bengals vs. Broncos

How do the Bengals beat this team?
I NEVER go into a game thinking, there is no way they win this game.
But I gotta tell ya, I just don't see it.

I could be wrong, but it appears to me the context of both threads is identical: how unlikely it will be for the Bengals to beat the Broncos.

Stop being so logical.

[Bryan]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

It's not always quite as simple as just reading thread titles. If we merely went by thread titles, we'd be getting even more complaints than we do now.

Here's the title & the entire opening post from the first (& current) thread:

Watchin the Denver vs New Orleans game...

We're not beating Denver, guys....
Denver is calling plays that get wide open against New Orleans, they're gonna do the same thing to us.

This is the title & opening lines of your thread:

Bengals vs. Broncos

How do the Bengals beat this team?
I NEVER go into a game thinking, there is no way they win this game.
But I gotta tell ya, I just don't see it.

I could be wrong, but it appears to me the context of both threads is identical: how unlikely it will be for the Bengals to beat the Broncos.

I thought you weren't allowed to respond to things like this, especially if a member calls out the Mod team like this.

[34inXXIII]

Originally Posted by Bryan

I thought you weren't allowed to respond to things like this, especially if a member calls out the Mod team like this.

I probably shouldn't have and it's quite possibly my boss will insist that I not do so in the future. However, I feel this is a rather innocuous matter. If the OP had been completely billigerant, I probably would not have bothered. As it is, I thought it might help for him and others to see a little bit of where we're coming from here. It's not a perfect process, but it's not done randomly and without reason either.

[berserkerone88]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

I probably shouldn't have and it's quite possibly my boss will insist that I not do so in the future. However, I feel this is a rather innocuous matter. If the OP had been completely billigerant, I probably would not have bothered. As it is, I thought it might help for him and others to see a little bit of where we're coming from here. It's not a perfect process, but it's not done randomly and without reason either.

Well that just ruins my day

[34inXXIII]

Originally Posted by berserkerone88

Well that just ruins my day

I will randomly merge on of your threads if it makes you feel better.

[berserkerone88]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

I will randomly merge on of your threads if it makes you feel better.

Make sure you merge it with another that really doesn't make sense to be merged.
Just for the lulz

[berserkerone88]

Originally Posted by Murphy

Allen is a myth. He does not exist.

Id rather have a myth over a tool.

[Carlos Spicyweiner]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

I probably shouldn't have and it's quite possibly my boss will insist that I not do so in the future. However, I feel this is a rather innocuous matter. If the OP had been completely billigerant, I probably would not have bothered. As it is, I thought it might help for him and others to see a little bit of where we're coming from here. It's not a perfect process, but it's not done randomly and without reason either.

Thank you. I was not being completely belligerent. And as I stated, I had not read the other thread. Thanks 34, do understand now.

But don't understand why Berserker has to always sound like an arrogant know-it-all.

[Who2Dey]

Originally Posted by Carlos Spicyweiner

Thank you. I was not being completely belligerent. And as I stated, I had not read the other thread. Thanks 34, do understand now.

But don't understand why Berserker has to always sound like an arrogant know-it-all.

Haha.

[SunsetBengal]

[quote=Carlos Spicyweiner;2667426]Thank you. I was not being completely belligerent. And as I stated, I had not read the other thread. Thanks 34, do understand now.

But don't understand why Berserker has to always sound like an arrogant know-it-all.[/quote]



I'm not sure that I would classify Beserker as a "know it all", but he does know football pretty well...

[silenetwolf]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

It's not always quite as simple as just reading thread titles. If we merely went by thread titles, we'd be getting even more complaints than we do now.

Here's the title & the entire opening post from the first (& current) thread:

Watchin the Denver vs New Orleans game...

We're not beating Denver, guys....
Denver is calling plays that get wide open against New Orleans, they're gonna do the same thing to us.

This is the title & opening lines of your thread:

Bengals vs. Broncos

How do the Bengals beat this team?
I NEVER go into a game thinking, there is no way they win this game.
But I gotta tell ya, I just don't see it.

I could be wrong, but it appears to me the context of both threads is identical: how unlikely it will be for the Bengals to beat the Broncos.

You know you are just confusing him don't you?

[berserkerone88]

[quote=SunsetBengal;2667573]

Originally Posted by Carlos Spicyweiner

Thank you. I was not being completely belligerent. And as I stated, I had not read the other thread. Thanks 34, do understand now.

But don't understand why Berserker has to always sound like an arrogant know-it-all.[/quote]



I'm not sure that I would classify Beserker as a "know it all", but he does know football pretty well...

Dawwww

[Helldog]

Originally Posted by Carlos Spicyweiner

Thank you. I was not being completely belligerent. And as I stated, I had not read the other thread. Thanks 34, do understand now.

But don't understand why Berserker has to always sound like an arrogant know-it-all.

Since when does all mean nothing ??

[SteelCitySouth]

Originally Posted by 34inXXIII

I will randomly merge on of your threads if it makes you feel better.

*one

Illiterate mod. Respond to that...

[TheBengals]

I'm always surprised every time this happens!

[HarleyDog]

You guys crack me up!