Cincinnati Bengals

Go Back   Cincinnati Bengals Message Boards - Forums > Cincinnati Bengals Football Discussion > The NFL Draft

The NFL Draft Year-round discussion of all aspects of the NFL Draft, including a subforum specifically dedicated to mock drafts.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 11-07-2012, 12:34 PM
Burma's Avatar
Burma Burma is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,430
Rep Points: 4929
Default Drafttek mock 11/3/12

http://www.drafttek.com/2013-NFL-Mock-Draft-Round1.asp

Talk about one very odd draft. They have us taking Damontre Moore, DE and passing on Jarvis Jones. I have not researched them completely to know their criteria but that seems hard to believe.
__________________
Quote:
We asked him about the time he fumbled without being hit and the time he threw an interception without being pressured and the other pick he threw -- under pressure but stupidly off his back foot toward double coverage. All of that happened on three consecutive possession, a 10-minute fusillade of fail that turned a one-possession game into a blowout loss...

Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:02 PM
Jasonew6's Avatar
Jasonew6 Jasonew6 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,332
Rep Points: 28056
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Yeah, if Jones is available, he's at the top of my Bengals wish list.
__________________

Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:04 PM
Jasonew6's Avatar
Jasonew6 Jasonew6 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,332
Rep Points: 28056
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Jarvis Jones going 17??????



Whoever did that mock must be a huge Dallas homer!
__________________

Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 11-07-2012, 01:06 PM
OchoCincos's Avatar
OchoCincos OchoCincos is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Columbus, OH
Posts: 2,081
Rep Points: 2447
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Jones would make us set at SAM. He would be better to take than Moore. From what Draftek thinks, they see Moore initially being put into our DL rotation then eventually becoming our future SAM. I don't like projects earlier than round 5, and I agree that Jones is better BPA and fills a bigger need.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 11-07-2012, 05:36 PM
Shady's Avatar
Shady Shady is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Boise, Idaho
Posts: 9,464
Rep Points: 18743
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

They have us finishing ahead of Cleveland. I guess we ought to be glad that we're still better than the Browns, but I'll be surprised if we draft that late.

And I don't want a DE that high. C.J. Mosely is my new Kuechly.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 11-07-2012, 06:00 PM
TGISunday's Avatar
TGISunday TGISunday is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Posts: 2,214
Rep Points: 2528
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonew6 View Post
Jarvis Jones going 17??????



Whoever did that mock must be a huge Dallas homer!
I could see him making a drop like Da'quan Bowers if he has some serious health problems. However, to predict that at this point is downright hilarious.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11-07-2012, 06:06 PM
goalpost goalpost is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: cincinnati
Posts: 3,740
Rep Points: 3092
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Jones > Moore. However, Moore's 11 1/2 sacks and 19 TFL is better than Jones.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 11-07-2012, 07:12 PM
NATI BENGALS's Avatar
NATI BENGALS NATI BENGALS is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,661
Rep Points: 4123
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonew6 View Post
Jarvis Jones going 17??????



Whoever did that mock must be a huge Dallas homer!
I think they try their best to find knowledgeable fans from every team and let them make the picks. I like them because they always offer some alternate outcomes. And the draft never goes how people thought it would.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 11-08-2012, 12:12 AM
yellowxdiscipline's Avatar
yellowxdiscipline yellowxdiscipline is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincy
Posts: 7,861
Rep Points: 7430
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Barring a horrible injury or combine I dont see Jones going out of the top 5.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 11-08-2012, 01:27 AM
BobJones4980's Avatar
BobJones4980 BobJones4980 is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,386
Rep Points: 2056
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jasonew6 View Post
Jarvis Jones going 17??????



Whoever did that mock must be a huge Dallas homer!
Ha I felt a little silly taking him at 5 in my last mock but this is just ridiculous, btw I would probably throw my TV out the window if we pass on Jarvis Jones.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11-08-2012, 05:08 AM
yellowxdiscipline's Avatar
yellowxdiscipline yellowxdiscipline is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cincy
Posts: 7,861
Rep Points: 7430
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by BobJones4980 View Post
Ha I felt a little silly taking him at 5 in my last mock but this is just ridiculous, btw I would probably throw my TV out the window if we pass on Jarvis Jones.
If we pick any where from 10-20 and hes available we would be stupid to pass on him.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11-08-2012, 06:50 AM
Jasonew6's Avatar
Jasonew6 Jasonew6 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,332
Rep Points: 28056
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by yellowxdiscipline View Post
If we pick any where from 2-256 and hes available we would be stupid to pass on him.
Fixt.
__________________

Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11-08-2012, 08:45 AM
bradfritz21's Avatar
bradfritz21 bradfritz21 is online now
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Northern Kentucky
Posts: 10,169
Rep Points: 16540
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

I realize that we can never have too many pass rushers, but why would we take a DE when we have MJ, Dunlap, and a handful of other early needs?
__________________
http://bradfritz.org/

Visit my site or if you know of any schools, companies, youth groups, etc., that are in need of a public speaker.
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11-08-2012, 09:12 AM
Burma's Avatar
Burma Burma is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 2,430
Rep Points: 4929
Default Re: Drafttek mock 11/3/12

Quote:
Originally Posted by bradfritz21 View Post
I realize that we can never have too many pass rushers, but why would we take a DE when we have MJ, Dunlap, and a handful of other early needs?
Inconsistent pressure. Its feast or famine with us. We need someone who can provide consistent pressure from the DE position and provide insurance in case MJ leaves or Dunlap gets injured again.
__________________
Quote:
We asked him about the time he fumbled without being hit and the time he threw an interception without being pressured and the other pick he threw -- under pressure but stupidly off his back foot toward double coverage. All of that happened on three consecutive possession, a 10-minute fusillade of fail that turned a one-possession game into a blowout loss...


Last edited by Burma; 11-08-2012 at 09:17 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:21 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2012 Cincinnati Bengals. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate in any form without permission of the Cincinnati Bengals.