|
#1
|
||||
|
||||
|
Just when I had us pegged for a top 10 draft slot, we go and play for pride. As Marsellus Wallace said, “you may feel a slight sting. That's pride ****ing with you. **** pride. Pride only hurts. It never helps. You fight through that ****.”
1. Sam Montgomery, DE, LSU ![]() The most complete DE in this draft. Rocket fast off the snap; solid against the run and a full complement of pass rushing moves. He is the stud we have been missing for a long time. 2. Alec Ogletree, LB, Georgia ![]() Athletically gifted monster who is a natural 4-3 MLB. Runs and covers like a Safety, hits like a truck. 2b. Eric Reid, S, LSU ![]() Our long sought after answer at Safety. Steal of the draft. His stock is slipping through no fault of his own. Elam now looks to be the first safety off and Jefferson and Vaccarro are on the rise. 3. Montee Ball, RB, Wisconsin ![]() Surprise! HE’S BACK! After an abysmal start to his season behind a make shift O-line Ball has quietly put up a very productive season to the tune of 1226 yards and 16 TD so far. His turn around is so significant that he is starting to generate Heisman buzz again. Due it all back; Speed, power, soft hands, blitz pick up. No need for a RBBC approach. 4. Travis Frederick, C, Wisconsin ![]() The reason Montee Ball is going in the 3rd round. After a terrible start that saw their O-line coach fired the Badgers line has solidified behind the 6’4” 338lb center. Frederick has emerged as the heir to Peter Konz and is the anchor of the O-line. 5. Ray Edwards, DE, LSU ![]() if you watch the LSU defense and don’t notice Edwards, you’re not paying enough attention. Key part of that rotation has 3.5 sacks so far and is a monster against the run. Starter and star on any other team in college football. 6. Ray Graham, RB, Pitt ![]() Electric runner, would add the lightning to Ball’s thunder. Slow recovery from injury and stupid off field mistakes cost his stock a great deal. 6. Alex Hurst, OT, LSU ![]() 2nd team all SEC. Strong run blocking mauler, needs work in pass pro. Back up for Andre. Quality depth. Last edited by Burma; 11-13-2012 at 01:18 PM. |
|
#2
|
|||
|
|||
|
I would love if Ogletree fell to us in the second
|
|
#3
|
|||
|
|||
|
Reid has been taking bad angles all year. He has also been burned in man a few times, but I put that more on the coaches. He should never be manning up on a WR.
I think Hurst should be considered a guard. He is terrible in pass pro. He also left the team after the Fla. game and no one is really sure why. I would be very pleased with this draft. |
|
#4
|
||||
|
||||
|
I think its going to be very close. Oakland can win no more games if we are to have a shot at Ogletree.
Quote:
Hurst has been wretched in pass pro this year, but equally dominant in run blocking. I could see him backing up RG. |
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
First three selections would be very good.
As for Ball in the third though, I think there will be better RBs to choose than him. You are right about the power, the blocking, toughness, and TD machine. However, he has not ran well against a decent defense this year, netting below a 4.0 average against both Nebraska and Michigan State. He also has had only 9 receptions for 65 receiving yards and no receiving touchdowns this year. I know he had 300 receiving yards last year (12.8 YPR), but he has not been able to reproduce the same production this year. Ball only runs a 4.57 40-yard dash, which is slower than most of the RBs projected around him. Montee Ball has come back very well from his injury, but being considered for the Heisman is a huge stretch. He has not shown the same ability as he did last year when he had a better line. He would be an upgrade over BJGE though. |
|
#6
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#7
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
1. Don't take this wrong, I do not dislike the pick. But I doubt it happens. Especially if they re-sign MJ. And the way they rotate DEs, will they use a first round pick on a guy who won't play every down?
2a. Ok. 2b. If he lasts that long. Most of the rankings I see still have him in 1. 3. I think Wisconsin RBs are primarily a product of their O-line. How many great Wisky RBs have been great NFL RBs? 4. Cook isn't going anywhere and Robinson seems to be an adequate backup. Don't see them drafting a center unless he is clearly the BPA and no one of value that meets a need is available. 5. Not if we take the DE in 1. I think we might take 1 rotational DE, but I don't see us taking more than 1 (depending on free agency, of course). 6s. Ok.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#9
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
I would be good with a rotation of Dunlap/MJ/Montgomery/Edwards (if Edwards is greater than Jamaal Anderson & Gilberry). |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#11
|
|||
|
|||
|
I hope we get the best defensive plater available at LB, DE, or SS
|
|
#12
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
With 3 somewhat expensive dlinemen (with the probably extension of Atkins, Dunlap, MJ), in my mind, it makes sense to draft a cheap, high quality DE and thereby establish a defensive identity to the football team. Similar to the Giants approach. |
|
#14
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
None of them are first round picks. A 2, a 3, and a 4.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#15
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
If adding a 1st round DE would result in a consistant pass rush, then I support 100% drafting a 1st round DE. Heck, if adding a 1st round & 2nd round DE would create a consistant and dominant pass rush, then I am support this move 100%. |
|
#16
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#17
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Justin Smith was a "good" player here. He goes to SF and suddenly he's one of the top D-linemen in the NFL.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#18
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
In my understanding, Justin Smith was more of a 3-4 defensive end. Hence, there is a better fit in San Fran. Plus, there are a lot more defensive playmakers on the 49er defense (Navarro, Willis). As for your concern about coaching, I don't think that there is much validity as pertains to our defensive line. Geno was a 4th rounder, and he is doing very well. Both Dunlap (2nd) & MJ (3rd) were concerns based on their motor in college. They have done quite well. In my opinion, the Bengals simply don't have enough playmakers on the defense. The Bengals either need to add a player with elite talent at DE, or they need to add multiple "b" level talent players to the dline. Last edited by mulligan; 11-15-2012 at 12:27 PM. |
|
#19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Pretty big LSU fan huh. Nice mock although I wouldnt touch Ball until the fourth.
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|