The Steelers path to the playoffs.

[gmdino]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

So the phantom holding call well after the Chiefs scored was no big deal huh. And the pass interference where he was ran into too huh. Im not saying the Chiefs didn't deserve alot of the flags because they did. But taking points off the board changes the game not to even mention how bad the Steelers were playing all together. Those calls helped you guy's win point blank. Also I am a Bengals fan and this is my house i'll go were the **** i want. WHODEY!!!!

That was a bad PI call...but one they make too frequently. And also it might have made up for the other blatant one they didn't call earlier in the game.

I was there...the refs stunk.

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by Captain Obvious

I think the penalty for team celebration after the incomplete pass was dumb. In my opinion, if the fumble didn't happen, thn the celebration penalty shouldn't happen either. As for your ridiculous *****ing about a pretty good called game, go back to the Jungle Noise with your **** buddies and whine about useless **** over there until you grow p and realize Pittsburgh is one of the most penalized teams this year.

Also that is complete ****. Not even close buddy, here's the link.

http://www.footballdb.com/penalties.html

[wildcatnku24]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Also that is complete ****. Not even close buddy, here's the link.

http://www.footballdb.com/penalties.html

Wow, the Bengals are doing VERY WELL in the penalties / yards stat. Ain't that a peach!

[neek]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Also that is complete ****. Not even close buddy, here's the link.

http://www.footballdb.com/penalties.html

Steeler fans don't like facts, puts those things away.

[silenetwolf]

Originally Posted by neek

Steeler fans don't like facts, puts those things away.

Bengal fans can't read facts

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by silenetwolf

Bengal fans can't read facts

Well i found them and I'm a Bengals fan soooo....

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by wildcatnku24

Wow, the Bengals are doing VERY WELL in the penalties / yards stat. Ain't that a peach!

Yup if we could fix those FS we would be the best.

[silenetwolf]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Well i found them and I'm a Bengals fan soooo....

I rest my case. The number of penalties is insignificant, it's the yardage lost that is the most important thing. Now let us take a look at that.

Well what do you know.

1. Washington Redskins - yardage lost 649 yards
2. Baltimore Ravens - yardage lost 618 yards
3. Pittsburgh Steelers - yardage lost 604 yards

So while the Steelers may not have the most penalties, they are 3rd in lost yardage due to penalties.

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by silenetwolf

I rest my case. The number of penalties is insignificant, it's the yardage lost that is the most important thing. Now let us take a look at that.

Well what do you know.

1. Washington Redskins - yardage lost 649 yards
2. Baltimore Ravens - yardage lost 618 yards
3. Pittsburgh Steelers - yardage lost 604 yards

So while the Steelers may not have the most penalties, they are 3rd in lost yardage due to penalties.

the more yardarge a penalty is usaully the result of a more abvious call. So they have no choice. Also depends at what point of the game they happen in. Any time they can change the momentum is usaully in your guys favor. You could argue stats if you want i merly brought it up to prove a point. I don't put much stock into them personally, i prefer to see things in real life and respond to that.

[Captain Obvious]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Also that is complete ****. Not even close buddy, here's the link.

http://www.footballdb.com/penalties.html

They were one of the highest, but now they dropped to 14 due to getting flagged with only half as many as their average their past 3 games.

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/penalties-per-game

[rotobeast]

Originally Posted by Bmoreblitz

A little Kid & Play action !!

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by Captain Obvious

They were one of the highest, but now they dropped to 14 due to getting flagged with only half as many as their average their past 3 games.

http://www.teamrankings.com/nfl/stat/penalties-per-game

Hook, line and sinker. I knew that but was waiting to see if one of you Steeler fans would bring it up. Is that coincidence that thats the same time they started actually winning games.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Hook, line and sinker. I knew that but was waiting to see if one of you Steeler fans would bring it up. Is that coincidence that thats the same time they started actually winning games.

OMG!!! Are you implying that a team that reduces the amount of penalties they commit have a better chance of winning games!!??? Where did you get this inside information?

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by duke0476

OMG!!! Are you implying that a team that reduces the amount of penalties they commit have a better chance of winning games!!??? Where did you get this inside information?

Really all caps, you're either an elementry student or you starve for attention. Anyway's is the Team reducing penaties or is someone reducing them for them. That kind of the whole point of this thread you know.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Really all caps, you're either an elementry student or you starve for attention. Anyway's is the Team reducing penaties or is someone reducing them for them. That kind of the whole point of this thread you know.

No, not all caps. You are either legally blind or developmentally handicapped. Perhaps the tin foil hat is obstructing your view?

[rfaulk34]

Originally Posted by duke0476

OMG!!! Are you implying that a team that reduces the amount of penalties they commit have a better chance of winning games!!??? Where did you get this inside information?

Illegal procedure #0476, misplaced sarcasm. Five post penalty, retry 1st reply.

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by duke0476

No, not all caps. You are either legally blind or developmentally handicapped. Perhaps the tin foil hat is obstructing your view?

Besides the point. ok all bold you happy. Still prettty sad, You seem mad why? Is it the fact you know I'm right are you ok. do you need a tissue.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Besides the point. ok all bold you happy. Still prettty sad, You seem mad why? Is it the fact you know I'm right are you ok. do you need a tissue.

OK, so it is the latter, thank you for clearing that up.

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by duke0476

OK, so it is the latter, thank you for clearing that up.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Originally Posted by duke0476

No, not all caps. You are either legally blind or developmentally handicapped. Perhaps the tin foil hat is obstructing your view?

Originally Posted by duke0476

OK, so it is the latter, thank you for clearing that up.

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by duke0476

Ha you are the one that's mental, what does latter have anything to do with that. it's a period of time so you would have had to been discusing point's in time which you weren't. I think you should have uswed the word other or someting just not latter. Which further proves my point you're clearly mental so thanks for clearing that up.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Ha you are the one that's mental, what does latter have anything to do with that. it's a period of time so you would have had to been discusing point's in time which you weren't. I think you should have uswed the word other or someting just not latter. Which further proves my point you're clearly mental so thanks for clearing that up.

My turn

[Dmac18]

Originally Posted by duke0476

My turn

Originally Posted by duke0476

OK, so it is the latter, thank you for clearing that up.

Definition of LATTER a: belonging to a subsequent time or period : more recent <the latter stages of growth>

b: of or relating to the end <in their latter days>

c: recent, present <affected by latter calamities>

If you wanted to use that the way you wanted you could have used it objectively in which you didn't.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Definition of LATTER a: belonging to a subsequent time or period : more recent <the latter stages of growth>

b: of or relating to the end <in their latter days>

c: recent, present <affected by latter calamities>

I need to post absolutely nothing at this point. You are making yourself look like more of an idiot than I could ever hope to.

[SteelCitySouth]

Originally Posted by Dmac18

Ha you are the one that's mental, what does latter have anything to do with that. it's a period of time so you would have had to been discusing point's in time which you weren't. I think you should have uswed the word other or someting just not latter. Which further proves my point you're clearly mental so thanks for clearing that up.

Go back to school.

lat·ter

   /ˈlætər/ Show Spelled[lat-er] Show IPA
adjective 1. being the second mentioned of two ( distinguished from former): I prefer the latter offer to the former one.

2. more advanced in time; later: in these latter days of human progress.

3. near or comparatively near to the end: the latter part of the century.

4. Obsolete . last; final.

Given that in his sentence there is a former conclusion as to your inability to understand and a latter conclusion it is also acceptable to conclude that one would have to read the first earlier in time and read the latter, later in time therefore providing a time continuum for which to use the word latter.

However given the first definition of the word latter we don't need to get all fancy to realize how dumb you are.