What happens if...

[Lygraf]

Originally Posted by yellowxdiscipline

Hypothetically speaking... What if Coltsturd never existed? Maybe Smack Talk would be a lot better for it.

every forum needs a whipping boy

[coltsfan4ever]

Originally Posted by neek

Why're you so obsessed with Delhomme? He's not even in the NFL anymore?

[coltsfan4ever]

Originally Posted by yellowxdiscipline

Hypothetically speaking... What if Coltsturd never existed? Maybe Smack Talk would be a lot better for it.

Hypothetically speaking, if the Bengals never existed, maybe the NFL would be a lot better for it.

[BigPapaKain]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Why're you so obsessed with Delhomme? He's not even in the NFL anymore?

If you're so over Delhomme, why do you respond to damn near every picture neek or I post of him?

Bump fists and play nice;

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Hypothetically speaking, if the Bengals never existed, maybe the NFL would be a lot better for it.

Just because you overheard your parents saying this over and over does not mean it applies to football.

[Cin726]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Hypothetical?


Are you kidding? Here, let me remind of a 2 hypothetical losses that occurred to the Bengals that was considered shocking at the time:

1) Dolphins
2) Browns

Ring a bell?

The Raiders could very well go in Paul Brown Stadium and ring the bell of the Bengals. It's not hypothetical at all. It's actually a realistic POSSIBLITY!!

Wow.

hy·po·thet·i·cal *(hp-tht-kl) also hy·po·thet·ic (-thtk)
adj.
1. Of, relating to, or based on a hypothesis: a hypothetical situation. See Synonyms at theoretical.
2.
a. Suppositional; uncertain. See Synonyms at supposed.
b. Conditional; contingent.

Now please feel free to explain to the class why your original post would not fall under such a definition.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by Cin726

Wow.


Now please feel free to explain to the class why your original post would not fall under such a definition.

I thought his post made him sound like he didn't know the meaning of hypothetical as well.
Coltsfan usually doesn't make mistakes like that.

[rfaulk34]

Originally Posted by Woodley

Coltsfan usually doesn't make mistakes like that.

Yes he does.

[yellowxdiscipline]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Hypothetically speaking, if the Bengals never existed, maybe the NFL would be a lot better for it.

Its ok I forgive you for learning football from playing Madden..

[coltsfan4ever]

Originally Posted by BigPapaKain

If you're so over Delhomme, why do you respond to damn near every picture neek or I post of him?

Bump fists and play nice;

Because... you and Neek are just being a-holes, that's all. It's not even good smack.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

Yes he does.

Maybe you should take that up with him.

[rfaulk34]

Originally Posted by Woodley

Maybe you should take that up with him.

Why would i take it up with him? You made the claim.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

Why would i take it up with him? You made the claim.

Of course I did, but I am a neutral observer so I won't argue against you on his behalf.

[Interceptor]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Because... you and Neek are just being a-holes, that's all. It's not even good smack.

Looks like you weakened first by resorting to personal attacks. Somebody hurt your feelings?

[rfaulk34]

Originally Posted by Woodley

Of course I did, but I am a neutral observer so I won't argue against you on his behalf.

I'll make it a little clearer for you. You made an observation. I challenged that observation. Why would i take it up with him when i'm challenging your observation?

That would be you arguing against me on your behalf. Capiche?

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by rfaulk34

I'll make it a little clearer for you. You made an observation. I challenged that observation. Why would i take it up with him when i'm challenging your observation?

That would be you arguing against me on your behalf. Capiche?

Yes, you challenged my observation, and I let it go at that. You're entitled to your opinion.
Not going to argue with you.

Got it so far?

If you're looking for an argument (I dont know why, you always lose), then tell Coltsfan he is always wrong and take it up with him.

That wasn't so hard to understand was it?

[rfaulk34]

Originally Posted by Woodley

Yes, you challenged my observation, and I let it go at that. You're entitled to your opinion.
Not going to argue with you.

Got it so far?

If you're looking for an argument (I dont know why, you always lose), then tell Coltsfan he is always wrong and take it up with him.

That wasn't so hard to understand was it?

If i always lose, why are you so afraid to engage?

[Lygraf]

[coltsfan4ever]

Originally Posted by Interceptor

Looks like you weakened first by resorting to personal attacks. Somebody hurt your feelings?

Personal attacks? Dude... did you not read your pictograms? That's about as personal as it gets.

My calling you an a-hole isn't a personal attack. It's factual. Like water is wet, grass is green, and the sun rises in the east.

You're just trying to get a rise out of me and I'm not going to bite.

[Interceptor]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Personal attacks? Dude... did you not read your pictograms? That's about as personal as it gets.

My calling you an a-hole isn't a personal attack. It's factual. Like water is wet, grass is green, and the sun rises in the east.

You're just trying to get a rise out of me and I'm not going to bite.

I don't care how you spin it. You showed personal weakness by resorting to personal attacks. It's obvious to everyone and it showed in that post. That is factual. But I will stop right here because you might get your feelings hurt again and start calling me names.

[Fan_in_Kettering]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

... Pick 6 Palmer and the Raiders BEAT the Bengals in their own house?

Unlikely. The Raiders don't have a defense. In fact, they are dead last in yards given up.

[GreenHornet]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

... Pick 6 Palmer and the Raiders BEAT the Bengals in their own house?

Will Bengal fans heads explode? Will that be the end of Marvin? Will the Bengals playoff hopes be crushed by the man who decided that retiring is much preferable than playing another down as a Bengal?

Bet this upsets you the most.

[BigPapaKain]

Originally Posted by coltsfan4ever

Because... you and Neek are just being a-holes, that's all. It's not even good smack.

It's so weak that it's made you get so angry and 'go to the shooting range' which, come to think of it, is an awesome way to say you rubbed one out in frustration.

And you saying someone's smack isn't good is like you trying to claim that the Earth is flat.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by BigPapaKain

And you saying someone's smack isn't good is like you trying to claim that the Earth is flat.

It is kain. Anyone with half a brain knows that.

The Flat Earth Society - Index

[yellowxdiscipline]

Originally Posted by BigPapaKain

It's so weak that it's made you get so angry and 'go to the shooting range' which, come to think of it, is an awesome way to say you rubbed one out in frustration.

And you saying someone's smack isn't good is like you trying to claim that the Earth is flat.

He "rage jerked" it?