Cincinnati Bengals

Go Back   Cincinnati Bengals Message Boards - Forums > Cincinnati Bengals Football Discussion > The NFL Draft > Mock Drafts

Mock Drafts Post your mock here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:31 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
bengals Top 5 Offense after this mock

1.Resign Andre 4/34 14 guaranteed

2.Resign MJ 4/32 12 guaranteed

3.Resign Gilberry,Pacman,Newman,Nugent,Newman

4.Sign RB Chris Ivory 4/5

5.Pick up a 3rd from the 49ers for future picks

6. We'll probably get a cpl more comp picks, with those I would add depth at C so Cook can be traded/released and BPA.


1.Terrence Williams WR Baylor (Trade back with Packers and get a 3rd)

2a.Khaseem Greene WLB Rutgers

2b.Kyle Van Noy SLB BYU

3a.Tony Jefferson S Okla

3b.Robert Alford CB/KR SE La (from 49ers)

3c.Stedman Bailey WR West Va ( from Packers) (Baby Hawk replacement)

4.Kenjon Barner RB Oregon

5a.Cornelius Washington DE Ga

5b.(Livings Comp) Micheal Williams TE Bama

6a.Chris Jones DT/DE Bowling Green

6b.Sam Brenner G/T Utah (Allowed only 2 sacks the last 2 yrs.)



UDFA Phillip Steward OLB Houston (always around the ball,good pass rusher and good coverage)
UDFA Mark Harrison WR Rutgers 6'3 230 4.5 speed
UDFA Quincy McDuffie WR/KR 4.34 speed 34.2 KR avg. 3 TD's
UDFA Marquise Goodwin WR/KR Tx(legit 4.2 speed, former track star.)
UDFA Rod Woodson FS N Alabama(yes it's his son, Bama transfer).
UDFA Braden Wilson FB Kansas St.
UDFA Keenan Davis WR Iowa
UDFA T.J. Barnes DT Ga Tech 6'6 345
UDFA Luke Marquardt OT Azusa Pacific 6'9 322
UDFA Latavius Murray RB UCF
UDFA Colby Cameron QB La Tech
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:34 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Teams don't just give up random picks for future picks.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:35 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

they have multiple 3rd round picks and are a deep team. getting a 3rd from them would not be all that hard to do.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:36 PM
NATI BENGALS's Avatar
NATI BENGALS NATI BENGALS is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,684
Rep Points: 4224
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

You are all about getting an extra 3rd from San Fran, what exactly are you giving up to get that?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:39 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

We can give them a 3rd and a 6th in the following years.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:41 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
they have multiple 3rd round picks and are a deep team. getting a 3rd from them would not be all that hard to do.
We have an extra second and are a deep team. Should we give up our 2nd for a future 2nd and 6th?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:43 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88 View Post
We have an extra second and are a deep team. Should we give up our 2nd for a future 2nd and 6th?
serker you don't always have to be a smart***. It would help our team out so what's the problem with it?? NOTHING so get overself already!
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:49 PM
NATI BENGALS's Avatar
NATI BENGALS NATI BENGALS is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,684
Rep Points: 4224
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

I highly doubt that would work. When teams give up a pick and get no picks for that year in return they usually get a pick earlier than the original one they gave up for the following year.

Nobody is going to rent us a 3rd round pick for just a 6th as compensation.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:49 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
serker you don't always have to be a smart***. It would help our team out so what's the problem with it?? NOTHING so get overself already!
because it is beyond ridiculous to think a team would just throw away picks without nothing in return. SF gains nothing for 2013. Teams don't do that.
They may throw away a player and contract for something but no team will give up a 3rd for nothing
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:53 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by NATI BENGALS View Post
I highly doubt that would work. When teams give up a pick and get no picks for that year in return they usually get a pick earlier than the original one they gave up for the following year.

Nobody is going to rent us a 3rd round pick for just a 6th as compensation.
well we have plenty of picks this year as well once we get those comp picks. It's not like they couldn't make a deal work. Hell we could give them Tate and a pick possibly.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:53 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88 View Post
because it is beyond ridiculous to think a team would just throw away picks without nothing in return. SF gains nothing for 2013. Teams don't do that.
They may throw away a player and contract for something but no team will give up a 3rd for nothing
I NEVER said we'd get the pick for NOTHING stop assuming.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:54 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
well we have plenty of picks this year as well once we get those comp picks. It's not like they couldn't make a deal work. Hell we could give them Tate and a pick possibly.
Why would they want Tate?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:55 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
I NEVER said we'd get the pick for NOTHING stop assuming.
Then what are we giving up?!?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 12-29-2012, 09:59 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88 View Post
Why would they want Tate?
Because Ginn Jr is horrible and Williams who just got hurt and out for the season fumbles alot.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:02 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
Because Ginn Jr is horrible and Williams who just got hurt and out for the season fumbles alot.
Tate is horrible and fumbles.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:03 PM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88 View Post
Then what are we giving up?!?
give them a 5th and a 6th this year and a 3rd next year
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:07 PM
berserkerone88's Avatar
berserkerone88 berserkerone88 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Did you get that thing I sencha?
Posts: 19,935
Rep Points: 23931
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
give them a 5th and a 6th this year and a 3rd next year
Still don't see that working.
91 - 136 pts

151 - 31 pts
182 - 18.6 pts
future 3rd.

We would probably have to send a 2nd next year and it would have to be a can't-miss player.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 12-29-2012, 10:11 PM
NATI BENGALS's Avatar
NATI BENGALS NATI BENGALS is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,684
Rep Points: 4224
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by pulses View Post
well we have plenty of picks this year as well once we get those comp picks. It's not like they couldn't make a deal work. Hell we could give them Tate and a pick possibly.
I would rather be on the side stock piling picks than the one giving up a lot to get one pick.

Like you said when we get the comp picks we could end up with maybe 10 total picks this year.

Preferably we keep the majority of this team together and our late round picks have a huge battle on their hands to even make the roster.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 12-30-2012, 12:46 AM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Talking Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by NATI BENGALS View Post
I would rather be on the side stock piling picks than the one giving up a lot to get one pick.

Like you said when we get the comp picks we could end up with maybe 10 total picks this year.

Preferably we keep the majority of this team together and our late round picks have a huge battle on their hands to even make the roster.
Hell I'd even give them Orson Charles and a late pick for that 3rd and then we can just draft Kelce from UC
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 12-30-2012, 06:41 AM
Hammerstripes Hammerstripes is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Atkinson, NE
Posts: 7,535
Rep Points: 6404
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

11 picks would be a complete waste. Only 5 or 6 would make the team.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 12-30-2012, 07:24 AM
pulses pulses is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Southeastern Indiana
Posts: 1,545
Rep Points: 632
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Hammerstripes View Post
11 picks would be a complete waste. Only 5 or 6 would make the team.
That all depends on who is resigned and who isn't.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 12-30-2012, 07:39 AM
Bengals Fan For Life! Bengals Fan For Life! is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Rep Points: 182
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Like how it is labeled Top 5 Offense and 1 of the first 5 picks is offense...oh and Ivory...that will push us over the edge to a Top 5 offense. Don't think so.

Jefferson won't be here in 4th.

Neither line is addressed in first 4 rounds.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 12-30-2012, 07:55 AM
Bengals Fan For Life! Bengals Fan For Life! is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 207
Rep Points: 182
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

No way K. Greene is a defacto first round pick...at best he should/will go 50-64...not 36.
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:43 AM
shaolinghost shaolinghost is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,572
Rep Points: 4645
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bengals Fan For Life! View Post
No way K. Greene is a defacto first round pick...at best he should/will go 50-64...not 36.
He performed well in the Bowl game, and he'll likely have a good combine. Him going top 40 is a definite possibility.
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 12-30-2012, 09:54 AM
Jasonew6's Avatar
Jasonew6 Jasonew6 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Posts: 14,690
Rep Points: 29515
Default Re: Top 5 Offense after this mock

You are giving up multiple picks for Robert Alford when Barner can be a return guy?

And Ginn is a better returner than Tate.
__________________

Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:53 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2012 Cincinnati Bengals. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate in any form without permission of the Cincinnati Bengals.