|
#1
|
|||
|
|||
|
How would you guys feel about this if :
- We re-sign all of our key FA's (Andre, MJ, Pacman, Gilberry, Hawkins, Brown, Huber, Howard, etc.) - We sign either someone to play SLB or MLB (or move Burfict here and Thomas starts WILL). - We sign a receiver to play opposite of AJ Green. Draft 1.) Kenny Vaccarro S Texas 2a.) Jordan Poyer CB Oregon State 2b.) Joesph Randle RB Oklahoma State 3.) Tank Carradine DE Florida State 4.) Gerald Hodges LB Penn State 5.) Tavarres King WR Georgia 6a.) Michael Williams TE Alabama 6b.) Zac Stacy RB Vanderbilt Last edited by RCBengalsFan; 01-20-2013 at 11:40 PM. |
|
#2
|
||||
|
||||
|
I like it. Vaccaro is one of my favorites. Poyer is really talented and I wouldn't hate the pick but we could look at other positions here as well. If we don't land Bernard then Randle would be a great backup plan. Probably the 2nd best fit for our needs.
__________________
|
|
#3
|
||||
|
||||
|
Interesting approach. Fill half important needs with free agents, and fill the other half with draft picks.
While I don't think it's the best pick, you really can't have enough good CB's. So I'd be ok with the Poyer pick, considering some people on these boards consider him the next J. Joe. IMO, I'd rather get him at 2b and get Bernard at 2a. But I can see him not making it to 2b and Randle is my 2nd favorite RB in this class... Wow, I didn't even realize I just reiterated JungleRocks post... I've heard nothing but good things from Hodges this offseason. So him the 4th is becoming unlikely. But who knows anything from Shrine bowl practices in January? All in all, good job
__________________
"You don't have bad luck, the reason bad things happen to you, is because you're a dumb---" - Red Forman |
|
#4
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#5
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Other than depth.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#6
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
. |
|
#7
|
|||
|
|||
|
Thank you, someone who agrees with me.
How would you feel about this draft? |
|
#8
|
||||
|
||||
|
We gave up alot of sacks. I think we need to upgrade the OLine, specifically Center. Putting Cook back in the offense changed the chemsitry and we never recovered. Maybe Robinson is the guy, but Marvin has to get over his love for vets over youth. If youth is dong the job, leave it the hell alone!! Ask Dunlap.
__________________
|
|
#9
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now, if he does not play well in 2013 it's time to look for a hew guy, or elevate Robinson.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#10
|
||||
|
||||
|
Pretty solid. I like the first 3 picks a lot.
__________________
![]() Just because science can explain it doesn't mean God didn't do it. |
|
#11
|
||||
|
||||
|
Maybe so with Cook, but it really wasn't right what Marvin did to put him back in there and keep playing him in spite of his lack of performance. But that's a different issue. I'd kind of hate to spend a pick on an Olineman early in the draft because there are other positions that we need to upgrade more. Barrett Jones wouldn't be a bad pick, but I think I'd rather take Lacy or Bernard in the first two rounds.
__________________
|
|
#12
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#13
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Adequate, maybe. Improvement over Ghiacuc, absolutely. But, good? Top half of the NFL? I don't think so. Question: How far did the Bengals oline play fall when the UDFA rookie (Robinson) started in the middle of the season? Not too far, if at all. http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/baltimore-ravens/matt-birk/ Matt Birk is scheduled to be paid $3.45 million next year and the next year. http://www.spotrac.com/nfl/cincinnat...als/kyle-cook/ Kyle Cook is scheduled to be paid $3.34 million next year and the following and the following. Where do you value Cook? $101 less than Birk? I don't think so. They are night and day apart. Last edited by mulligan; 01-21-2013 at 10:32 PM. |
|
#14
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|