Not just the Steeler D getting old and worn out?

[6andcounting]

Originally Posted by GreggyDigital

Thank you. Although, I posted Steelerdepot;s article last year when Whatever and Luvnit wet their pants over the Steelers cap space and shockingly enough Pittsburgh still got under the cap.

The guy that does it always has the right numbers, and his suggestions to get under the cap are the very things we usually end up doing. It's not like he is saying trade Ben or something that just wouldn't happen.

Originally Posted by Luvnit2

I have never said the Steelers would have to dismantle their roster. They have succeeded in the past because they have drafted exceptionally well and developed their own. Of late, they have not done this and that is why they are heading downward. All teams have injuries, but teams with depth overcome them. The Ravens and Bengals are two teams who did just that in 2012.

The Steelers have no depth at too many key positions so when these older guys go down, there is noone to step up anymore. Losing a Mike Wallace will add to their depth problem in 2013. Let's see how it pans out. They need to sign:

1. Hampton or a replacement
2. Harrision or a replacement
3. Starks or a replacement
4. Mendenhall
5. Dwyer
6. Redman
7. Keenem Lewis
8. Colon
9. Legurski
10. Foster
11. Sylvester
12. Leftwich
13. Batch
14. Wallace
15. Cotchery

There is not a lot of money to sign these vets even if they do restructure. A guy like Keenan Lewis wants paid with his second contract and my guess could care less about the "Steeler Way".

All I did was post an article with exact cap numbers to your post talking about the Steelers cap situation. You start out for some reason saying, "I have never said the Steelers would have to dismantle their roster." and then post a bunch of nonsense that has nothing to do with the article I posted. I'm trying to be nice because i don't want you to leave again, but you're making it difficult.

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Luvnit2

I have never said the Steelers would have to dismantle their roster. They have succeeded in the past because they have drafted exceptionally well and developed their own. Of late, they have not done this and that is why they are heading downward. All teams have injuries, but teams with depth overcome them. The Ravens and Bengals are two teams who did just that in 2012.

The Steelers have no depth at too many key positions so when these older guys go down, there is noone to step up anymore. Losing a Mike Wallace will add to their depth problem in 2013. Let's see how it pans out. They need to sign:

1. Hampton or a replacement
2. Harrision or a replacement
3. Starks or a replacement
4. Mendenhall
5. Dwyer
6. Redman
7. Keenem Lewis
8. Colon
9. Legurski
10. Foster
11. Sylvester
12. Leftwich
13. Batch
14. Wallace
15. Cotchery

There is not a lot of money to sign these vets even if they do restructure. A guy like Keenan Lewis wants paid with his second contract and my guess could care less about the "Steeler Way".

Posts like this is exactly why you are better suited for Jungle Noise.

[Beaker]

Originally Posted by duke0476

Posts like this is exactly why you are better suited for Jungle Noise.

Another steeler fan pulling out the "you belong in JN" smack. Sure you dont wanna wave your "six rings" instead?

[duke0476]

Originally Posted by Beaker

Another steeler fan pulling out the "you belong in JN" smack. Sure you dont wanna wave your "six rings" instead?

Yes, because your displays of superb smack posts should be a lesson to us all.

[Luvnit2]

Originally Posted by duke0476

Posts like this is exactly why you are better suited for Jungle Noise.

I am sorry little fella you are not welcome in your team's version of JN.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by Beaker

Another steeler fan pulling out the "you belong in JN" smack. Sure you dont wanna wave your "six rings" instead?

You belong in JN.........cause you can't smack.

[Beaker]

Originally Posted by Woodley

You belong in JN.........cause you can't smack.

You say that like anybody places any worth on your opinion.

[Woodley]

Originally Posted by Beaker

You say that like anybody places any worth on your opinion.

No, I say that because you should go back to JN.