|
|||||||
| The NFL Draft The Bengals will have three of the first 56 selections in the 2013 NFL Draft. Discuss it all here. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#26
|
||||
|
||||
|
If the #21 pick comes around and the best value is a WR, wouldn't bother me a bit. I don't care what order the holes are filled in, just that they're filled. With several needs, each round should provide value where there's need. Sign quality FA's, keep who needs to be kept and keep adding quality in the draft.
__________________
|
|
#27
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Quote:
Last edited by chasf316; 01-27-2013 at 05:06 PM. |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
i agree we have to dev sanu, etc. but another higher pick to add in the mix would not be a bad idea.
However.... only if a stud fell to us.... thats how i would handle it.
__________________
"We treat it like the Hunger Games,"Whoever gets there first, me, Geno, and Mike are licking our chops like we hadn't eaten all day." -Dunlap |
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
|
Me too. If you do end up in that situation, it's not like it would be a wasted pick.
__________________
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
except there are no AJ Greens or Julio Jones in this draft, any WR taken in this draft will already be light years behind Sanu and Jones. It usually takes a WR between 2-3 years to figure it out, there are exceptions such as AJ and megatron and marques colston, but 2-3 years is the general rule. a high round wr is a waste of a pick especially since we have holes in the back 7 on defense, on our line, and at RB.
|
|
#31
|
|||
|
|||
|
Like I'm sure others have said many times already, I think taking a WR in this draft at all, unless their far and away BPA, would be a wasted pick.
We already have so much young talent that needs some time to develop. If anything, I'd like to sign a good FA WR like Hartline, Jennings, Welker, or Bowe. That way they come in with good experience and we know they'll perform well. |
|
#32
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
And so much young talent? Bit of an overstatement, if you ask me. Sanu looks like a keeper. Jones, the jury is still out. After them, what? I like the idea of signing a FA but for how long?
__________________
|
|
#33
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
My only knock on Frederick is everything I'm reading says that he'll probably play guard in the NFL.
__________________
Visit my site or if you know of any schools, companies, youth groups, etc., that are in need of a public speaker. |
|
#34
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
It's not like we have a bunch of stallions at WR and we are burning our 3rd straight #1 pick on one. |
|
#35
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Get a solid veteran. Continue to develop Sanu and Jones, then in a year or two, re-assess the situation and draft accordingly. WTS, I can definitely see the logic in wanting to take a top talent in the draft, and wouldn't be upset if we drafted a WR with the 21st pick, but I would much prefer a likely "sure thing" with a veteran over a "maybe" with a rookie. |
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
I definitely agree with the original poster. We need a #2.
I realize that Sanu and Jones both showed promise, but waiting for promise to turn in productions is what led us to a season with Chris Perry as our starting RB, and Dan Coats as a starting TE. We need to get our offense on the move and be aggressive. We can't sit around and wait. With that said, I realize that AJ Greens and Julio Jones' spoil people. And I don't think anyone expects us to draft a WR in the top 10. But at 21, if Cordarelle Patterson is there he is the playmaker we need. He can do something after the catch, and do something with the ball in his hands. He's like Sanu and Jones combined into one. I think he'd really open it up. When I look at it in terms of value. Would a WR like Patterson, or a LB like Ogletree take this team further along? My vote would be WR.
__________________
He who laughs last thinks slowest. Final Mock 2012 1. Mark Barron - S 1. Courtney Upshaw - DE/OLB 2. Amini Silatolu - OG 3. Mohammed Sanu - WR 4. Ryan Steed - CB 5. Marcus Forston - DT 5. Tom Compton - OT 5. Ernest Owusu - DE 6. Michael Smith - RB |
|
#37
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Quote:
well i would love to have C.patterson but were not waiting for sanu and jones to produce we are waiting for next season to start. like u said they both showed promise...as rookies, and both showed it the minute they stepped on the field...neither one took time to get comfortable to the game. Jones balled out from the get go whether it be rookie camps pre season or regular season. jones played well and showed good promise as a rookie. Sanu when they finally pplayed him killed it. making tough catches in traffic dragging defenders and get as much as he could after he catch. Including 1 handed td catches...4 on the year i beleive. Im not sure what exactly u mean by we are waiting for them. Both came in and produced very well as rookies and now we are only waiting for next season for them to produce even more. Patterson would be sweet and i cant say i would be ****** if we grabbed him but with our depth and immediate needs i def want us to go a Different route. No go on a WR early. wouldnt mind a guy like Marquiss Wilson from washington state in the later rounds hes a top talent. |
|
#38
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Everyone isn't spoiled because of AJ there are plenty of WR's drafted every year that contribute, Blackmon, Floyd, Wright, TY Hilton, Chris Givens were all good WR's this year, the draft is a gamble sure but its a gamble at every position, but just wishing and hoping for a 5th round pick that didn't show a ton this year is gonna be our #2 WR next year is just as big of a gamble. Give me a veteran Jennings or maybe Hartline over the draft but if we dont get a good WR in FA then yea I think its a top 3 round pick for sure. |
|
#39
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Quote:
So if anyone thinks that a right now #2 is the way to fix the offense then they should be looking at the FA market. In the draft the most immediate fix this offense can get is in the ground game. If Ansah is sitting there at 21 and this team selects a WR then it would be a huge mistake!
__________________
|
|
#40
|
||||
|
||||
|
I have a couple things for this thread.
The first thing is that the notion of rookie receivers not "getting it" until a few years later doesn't really hold water. Just taking picks from right around the same position we are drafting this year (21)... Last year the Bengals #2 receivers accounted for roughly 65 catches, 776 yards, and 7 touchdowns. Rookie Year 2006 - 25th pick - Santonio Holmes - 4 starts, 49 catches, 824 yards, 2 touchdowns. 2007 - 23rd pick - Dwayne Bowe - 15 starts, 70 catches, 995 yards, 5 touchdowns. 2008 - No Wide Receivers taken in first round. 2009 - 22nd pick - Percy Harvin - 8 starts, 60 catches, 790 yards, 6 touchdowns. 2009 - 29th pick - Hakeem Nicks - 6 starts, 47 catches, 790 yards, 6 touchdowns. 2009 - 30th pick - Kenny Britt - 6 starts, 42 catches, 701 yards, 3 touchdowns. 2010 - 24th pick - Dez Bryant - 2 starts, 45 catches, 561 yards, 6 touchdowns. 2011 - Jones and Green both had excellent rookie seasons. Jon Baldwin not so much. 2012 - 20th pick - Kendall Wright - 5 starts, 64 catches, 626 yards, 4 touchdowns. Late first round rookie receivers have fared quite well recently. Don't let perceived history dictate draft philosophy. The second thing relates to people going against the notion of taking a wide receiver because we already have players who need to "develop". I have a few questions for those that feel that way. Since when did having talented players on a roster at the same position prevent a player from actually developing? How would Patterson, Hunter, Allen, or whomever was drafted prevent Sanu and Jones from reaching their potential?
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
#41
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#42
|
||||
|
||||
|
I still find linebacker a more pressing need than WR. With WR, we talk about Sanu and Jones, being young players developing.
At LB, we complain about Rey, Howard is coming off an injury and is getting older, Lawson is a FA (and should not be retained), Moch needs to get on the field but is always hurt, and Lamur has just come in. So LB is honestly the weakest position. Ogletree would be an immediate upgrade. As would Khaseem Greene. I understand people love offense, but you realize that defense still does win championships? Patriots had an awesome offense, but Ravens DEFENSE won that game, holding them to 13 points. 49ers were down, but their DEFENSE was clutch and kept them very much in the game. Why do you think the Steelers are always a contender? Their defense. Then they fill in pieces on offense. The Bengals are doing that, and doing it well. They have young talent, and are developing as a team.
__________________
![]() Follow me on Twitter:
https://twitter.com/wolfkaosaun My YouTube channel: http://www.youtube.com/andwegiveup Draft Rushel Shell when he declares! |
|
#43
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Of all of those years the only two receivers kept off of the list who were drafted in a similar position to where the Bengals are drafting were Jon Baldwin and Demaryius Thomas. Baldwin was poor as a rookie and that trend has continued. Thomas was left off of the list because his playing time as a rookie did not really warrant his numbers being included. He only dressed for 10 games and was the #4 receiver on that team. Even if you took those into account though you still have 7 very solid rookie receivers out of a 9 person sample size. Edit* Upon second review of this that doesn't actually bear out as truth. If we were to include Kenny Britt at 30th, then we should also add Jenkins at 30th in 2012. Another player who could not see the field as a rookie. Also, Robert Meachem was taken with the 27th pick in 2007 and did not play as a rookie due to a kneee injury. So with that the number would be 7 out of 11, or 63 percent, with at least one solid rookie being drafted in the later part of the first round every year.
__________________
![]() Quote:
Last edited by Broken1; 01-27-2013 at 07:26 PM. |
|
#44
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Point is every pick at every position is a risk and if WR is the BPA then it should be the pick, not keeping average players around hoping for best because your afraid a WR wont work out. |
|
#45
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Quote:
So say what you mean to say. If you do not like Ansah at 21 then say so but do not try to make something out of a statement that is not there. I also think this offense would improve more by improving the run game then they would by adding yet another young WR.
__________________
|
|
#46
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
We also are not picking 4th or 5th. Which in that case I would not touch a WR then. At 21 or the raider pick though we could get a nice player. One who could make an immediate impact. I honestly do not know the WR depth in the draft. Nor do I plan to do some vast research on it either. But I do know we will have a shot at one stud type. I think Sanu has a lot of promise and will do well. Jones I am not so sure of., He screams Andre Caldwell imo
__________________
"We treat it like the Hunger Games,"Whoever gets there first, me, Geno, and Mike are licking our chops like we hadn't eaten all day." -Dunlap |
|
#47
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#48
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#49
|
||||
|
||||
|
So do we not take a safety because we have young players in Mays, Sands, Iloka, and Miles? Do we not take a corner because we drafted Kirkpatrick and Prater last year?
__________________
![]() Quote:
|
|
#50
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Here Is Why Bengals Need A WR With A Top Pick
Do you honestly believe that Mays, Sands, or Miles have shown remotely close to the potential at their position that Sanu and Jonez haves shown at theirs? I mean honestly.
__________________
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|