|
|||||||
| Jungle Noise Bengals Football Discussion for BENGALS FANS ONLY. Visiting team fans please keep your postings in one of our other forums. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#101
|
||||
|
||||
|
I agree the Bengals should bid on Wallace, but prefer Bowe.
I made a similar point years back when Ray Lewis was working his last contract with the Ravens. Get in the bidding, drive up the price. Even if they don't get him, or even want him, the "competition" will force a bigger contract. Whatever the decision, I completely agree that any issue with WR's needs to be solved in FA, not the draft.
__________________
|
|
#102
|
|||
|
|||
|
Gee, what an original post. Nothing at all like the 300 other Mike Wallace threads already going...
But it's still not a good move. But I'm sure the steelers would love it if the bengals tied up a bunch of money in a receiver who isn't all that great. |
|
#103
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
First off I haven't logged on in a while so I had no idea about the Wallace threads so forgive me, but you cant Tell me wr shouldn't be addressed before draft. We Need a proven nfl receiver That Can hold his own against Man coverage, I dont care if Its not Mike Wallace, but would prefer him since I've seen him be a pain in the *** for us and the ravens
|
|
#104
|
||||
|
||||
|
Please explain the downside of lining up Wallace opposite AJ with Sanu in the slot.
__________________
![]() |
|
#105
|
||||
|
||||
|
because we already have a guy who can do that Ryan Whalen
__________________
2nd Manti Teo LB 2nd Eddie Lacy RB 3rd Barrett Jones G/C 4th Phillip Thomas S 5th Ricky Wagner T 6th Jordan Poyer CB 6th Zac Dysert QB 7th Chase Thomas LB 7th Michael Ford RB UDFA Dan Giordano DE UDFA Tony Jefferson S UDFA Roger Gaines T UDFA Matt McGloin QB UDFA Zach Sudfeld TE http://youtu.be/TOFXFOvqlXE A wise man learns from his mistakes but a wiser man learns from other peoples mistakes |
|
#106
|
||||
|
||||
|
You forgot your sarcasm tag... I hope.
__________________
|
|
#107
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
Either he's being sarcastic or he has a football IQ of zero
|
|
#108
|
||||
|
||||
|
Not the biggest Mike Wallace fan. Like Bowe better as well.
But saying Whalen can do better is absurd. Wallace already has numerous NFL TD's under his belt. Also runs a 4.33-- 40 yard dash compared to Whalens 4.62---40 yard dash. That is a big difference in speed alone.
__________________
Do not know much about luck. Just know that the more I practice, the more luck I have........................................... |
|
#109
|
|||
|
|||
|
Because dalton can't throw an accurate deep ball...
|
|
#110
|
|||
|
|||
|
Well if Madden 13 is anything to go by, Wallace wins the deep ball battle everytime, he's given me so many 80+ yard TD's its insane.... and my created guy is the Bengals QB btw :p
I wouldn't be unhappy to see Wallace here. Not sure about his reliability, doesn't have the best hands, and I think he's really best as a home run threat (which is Dalton's weakness). But again, wouldn't be unhappy to see him here. Not sure we'd be too improved in the short game, but Wallace's speed alone can stretch a defence. |
|
#111
|
|||
|
|||
|
I certainly would get in the bidding for Wallace and Bowe, but we don't have to give up on Whalen. Just cut Tate. Whalen is a very good all-purpose receiver with good hands.
I also haven't given up on Marvin Jones, who I think showed strong potential this past season, and who will continue to develop. To me, AJ and Wallace out wide, with Sanu and Hawkins sharing the slot, and Marvin Jones taking some snaps on a regular basis just seems like a coverage nightmare for the rest of the league. Whalen can be a low cost option, and a good receiver who can fill in during injuries. One final word about Marvin Jones: I know it all depends on how he works and develops, and to some degree, how he is used. But I think he has a chance to become an excellent NFL receiver. Last edited by ThunderCloud; 02-09-2013 at 03:50 PM. |
|
#112
|
|||
|
|||
|
Please nooooooooo.....this is called reckless spending...cant see mb doing this. wallace if anything, not bush. i think the draft will fill the rb position and i still like sanu and what we got, but id say wallace is too expensive and we can find another wr in the draft.
|
|
#113
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
To me the top two "young" WR's in Free Agency are both inconsistent.
Dwayne Bowe (28) and Mike Wallace (27) One's a speedster and that's his strong suit. In the end these are two guys that have put up decent numbers being the #1 receivers on their team. I think honestly they are both top of the line #2 guys that are just the best receivers on their team. I don't care what we do this season at this position honestly either We do nothing and stand pat with Marvin Jones and Mohammed Sanu hoping they can stay healthy, and develop across from AJ Sign Dwayne Bowe, Mike Wallace, Mike Hartline, etc. and have them step in across AJ (I for one don't like Hartline, but many here do). Draft a receiver early DeAndre Hopkins, Cordelle Patterson, etc. and hope they step in as rookies and help take pressure off of AJ and Andy Honestly I'd probably prefer option 2 or 3, but I don't care what we do as long as we are upgrading our other positions properly. Preferrably we go AJ at #1, new guy at #2, Sanu taking over the slot, and Hawkins coming in the slot and outside at times as well as 4 wide. Only thing about that is there isn't much to do with Marvin Jones.
__________________
![]() 2013 draft 1: Tyler Eifert TE Notre Dame 2a: Zach Ertz TE Stanford 2b: Gavin Escobar TE San Diego State 3: Travis Kelce TE Cincinnati 4: Jordan Reed TE Florida 5: Levine Toilolo TE Stanford 6a: Joseph Fauria TE UCLA 6b: Michael Williams TE Alabama 7a: Jake Stoneburner TE Ohio State 7b: Brandon Ford TE Clemson |
|
#114
|
|||
|
|||
|
Let me disperse some truth and reason.
Mike Wallace vs the AFC North last year produced a whopping 11 catches and 0 TDS. vs a weak passsive Browns defense,he caught 1 pass in 2 games. To put it in perspective..Plaxico Burress and Marvin Jones had one more TD vs the AFC North than Wallace did. He is gonna want 10-12 mil a year. Eh,no thanks. Let a team like the Fins cave in to his high price cause they can't draft WRs any how. The Bengals could use a true burner on the opposite side of A.J.But signing Wallace would not help your cap when have to resign Atkins, Green and perhaps Gresham. But that can be addressed in the draft in a mid RD. The Colts struck gold with Hilton and in FA with Avery. Donnie Avery made 600,000 last year. AJ Green is a number #1 WR.The Bengals don't have room for 2. Green has already voiced some displeasaures in why he isn't being targeted earlier. We have talent at WR. Its just a matter of Gruden becoming a better OC. If Gruden doesn't elevate this offense in 2013,Hue Jackson will be your OC in 2013. Gruden should be feeling some heat now. I'd rather have Reggie Bush at a cheaper price than Wallace. |
|
#115
|
||||
|
||||
|
The only way the Bengals could afford to sign Mike Wallace and keep him long term would be to let AJ walk after his contract is up.
Your talking about at least 5 yrs 60 mil dollars. Who out of Andre, MJ or Geno are you letting walk? I agree that some help is needed at the WR spot. They are going to have to go cheaper than Mike Wallace if they want to retain their own Free Agents for the long term. You can't pay everyone, that is the reality and challenge of it. |
|
#116
|
||||
|
||||
|
How about because when Dalton had 2 receivers who could take the top off a defense, he had a deep ball accuracy of 40%.
__________________
![]() Vi veri universum vivus vici. |
|
#117
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#118
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
__________________
LOVE YOU BETHANY AND BENGALS!!! LET HAVE A GOOD 2013 TOGETHER!!! |
|
#119
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
So if you pay Wallace this silly some of money he is looking for, which is money around what some of the elite at the position are making, then what number are you proposing to pay Green when it is time to extend him?
I mean you are going to pay a guy that THINKS he is one of the best upward of what guys that have proven they are the best. So what then do you pay AJ who IS one of the best?
__________________
|
|
#120
|
||||
|
||||
|
You're joking right?
__________________
![]() |
|
#121
|
||||
|
||||
|
I shall now ignore everything you ever say from now on
__________________
LOVE YOU BETHANY AND BENGALS!!! LET HAVE A GOOD 2013 TOGETHER!!! |
|
#122
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
Quote:
|
|
#123
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
People just refuse to do research
__________________
LOVE YOU BETHANY AND BENGALS!!! LET HAVE A GOOD 2013 TOGETHER!!! |
|
#124
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
Quote:
I prefer Bowe over Wallace, but either would be a better choice than Hartline...you, I, and a minority of others here look at Hartline RATIONALLY and without our Buckeye colored sunglasses... I also wouldn't mind an early pick on Patterson or Hopkins...however, the Bengals should front-end any deal with Bowe or Wallace in order to dump either's contract when it's time to re-sign AJ and/or Patterson/Hopkins Sanu's going to be fine in the slot...potential 70-80 reception player...Jones, I'm not sold on yet, but willing to give him another year or 2. As far as who'd I'd let walk...let it be MJ...Andre's developed into a fine RT and Geno...well there's no way we should let, arguably the best DT in the NFL, walk!...replacing MJ with any of the first 3 picks is realistic in this year's draft...I like MJ and although this was his best season thus far...he was virtually invisible in too many games this year. He's not worth the money he'll be seeking off this year's performance. |
|
#125
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Why it would be wise to go After Mike Wallace
Finally someone who u understands math and That we can upgrade like no other Team in the league right Now
|
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|