Christopher Dorner...The Manifesto

[Nebuchadnezzar]

Originally Posted by RedneckCrazyTrain

Apparently you didn't read what I posted. I'm looking at it more at what I see than hear.
What he states will easily be verified truth or fiction. Every picture you
see up until now is of a humble person. A Gentle Giant if you will.
The latter ones... a man on his mission.

Couple that with what the LAPD are known best for, I'll tend to believe him until he's
proven wrong in his statements.


He crossed their proverbial line. They didn't like it. He didn't like what they did to him for it.

He's paid his dues.

Hopefully they will have to pay theirs.

.

Hold on a minute here, you're not saying that this guy was justified in his actions because he was fired are you?

I sure as hell hope not because that's what it sounds like you're saying.

[Benton]

Originally Posted by RedneckCrazyTrain

Sorry, I don't see him as a terrorist at all. The eyes are the window to the soul and terrorist wasn't there.
Fed up? Confused?...at wits end for doing the right thing is what I see in the end.

Is a man unjust for exhausting all proper avenues in a corrupt system that destroyed his life,reputation,
well being, then taking it out on those who did this to him?
Yes he killed innocents (allegedly). But, those targeted are still in pain.
Which is what he wanted. I don't necessarily agree with the innocent ones, but understand his angle to a
degree as to why he did so. Nothings fair in love or war.
He was at war.

I see a once proud human being that grew through the ranks of our military, going on to do it eagerly in a
civilian enforcement role, in areas that I'm quite sure are as dangerous as any he may have been to in the military.
To actually want to do good, for the people he had already unselfishly served mind you, only to have it all stripped away
by garbage that manipulated their positions to protect more garbage that demonstrated undue violent acts
against the very people they were sworn to protect. The unjust were on borrowed time while he was alive. They knew it.
Journalist are going through every letter of that manifesto. Those involved in the coverups that can be proven, should be charged for complicity.

These events are a shocker to most. You don't see someone that's been screwed over by the elite and them having the cahonas to retaliate every day.

It amazes me how miserably some people confuse activism with terrorism.

At a base level, an activist points out a problem and refuses to take part in it. Sometimes that means civil discourse, sometimes it means breaking a law by failing to accept mandated actions. Rarely it results in violence, unless violence is taken against the activist.

A terrorist points points at a problem and then uses violence to coerce people to either think the same or change actions they don't agree with by murdering those involved.

Dorner disagreed with alleged wrongdoing and how did he respond? With violence. With inspiring fear.

Dorner was a terrorist. How long you looked into his eyes is regardless.

What if everyone had the "cahonas" to retaliate against perceived injustices? You wouldn't be able to step into a Wal-Mart, government building or public place due to the cross fire.

[Benton]

Originally Posted by RedneckCrazyTrain

No they don't.
They kill anyone and everyone and leave nothing in their wake when possible.
His goal was to instill fear into his enemies and take them out. John Q. Public had nothing to worry about. And he proved that.

"His goal was to instill fear in his enemies and take them out."

Which is, you know, exactly the same goal of any other garden variety terrorist, regardless of their cause. Dorner was no different than the Alphabet Bomber or Ramzi Yousef.

Dorner, terrorist.

[RhythmicGeek]

Originally Posted by RedneckCrazyTrain

No they don't.
They kill anyone and everyone and leave nothing in their wake when possible.
His goal was to instill fear into his enemies and take them out. John Q. Public had nothing to worry about. And he proved that.

Yes, they do. You are thinking of a terrorist in the way the media has tended to paint them. Terrorism is a much broader term. If you are using terror (fear) through your actions of unauthorized (read: illegal) violence to achieve an objective, you are a terrorist. Who he targeted means zero when it comes to the definition of a terrorist.

[Shady]

William Munny: "Its a hell of a thing killing a man..."you take away all he's got and all he's ever gunna have.............."

Kid: "Yeah....Well, I guess they had it comin'"


William Munny:. "We all have it coming kid"

Unforgiven

And some of you are worried about his political leanings, as if there's a correlation between his views and his actions. SMH

Does him being a liberal or a conservative make his life less valuable?

I think he was probably telling the truth. Still didn't justify what he did. Not even close.

[BANJAXED]

Originally Posted by Shady

And some of you are worried about his political leanings, as if there's a correlation between his views and his actions. SMH

Does him being a liberal or a conservative make his life less valuable?

I think he was probably telling the truth. Still didn't justify what he did. Not even close.

True, taking the 'law' into your own hands and becoming yourself a murderer is just as bad.

It always looks so much cooler in the movies.

[devils advocate]

Originally Posted by RhythmicGeek

Yes, they do. You are thinking of a terrorist in the way the media has tended to paint them. Terrorism is a much broader term. If you are using terror (fear) through your actions of unauthorized (read: illegal) violence to achieve an objective, you are a terrorist. Who he targeted means zero when it comes to the definition of a terrorist.

Including, but not limited to ....