Sanu fumble or Sanu Incomplete pass?

[Ron Mexico]

That is a catch and a fumble, and the refs blew it. I'm cool with that this time though.

[Ryan Mc]

Originally Posted by Johnny Cupcakes

That is a catch and a fumble, and the refs blew it. I'm cool with that this time though.

Well, according to the head of officiating who reviewed the play (see link two posts before yours), it was an incompletion and would have been ruled as such on any challenge/review.

[Ron Mexico]

Originally Posted by Ryan Mc

Well, according to the head of officiating who reviewed the play (see link two posts before yours), it was an incompletion and would have been ruled as such on any challenge/review.

Well according to me, he is wrong...

Just opinions.

Either way, I'm glad it ended up the way it did.

[fumetti]

Originally Posted by thebullfrog24

Am i the only person who thought that the sanu "fumble" was simply an incomplete pass?

He literally was just gettin ready to take his second step and the ball was already knocked out. It seems like no one is talking about that (probably because we won lol).

What are your guy's thoughts?

Absolutely. The NFL has called that exact play over the past 5+ years (during the current rule on this) is that it is ALWAYS an incompletion if it's even close. If they err, it's always been on the side of the ballcarrier.

How these "real refs" called this one a fumble is a complete mystery.

[Mack Morgan]

Originally Posted by BengalBaron

If the Gresham catch against the Ravens was incomplete, this catch was also incomplete. If I remember correctly, Gresham caught the ball and had firm passion of it. He made a couple of football moves and in his attempt to get a TD, he extended it across the goal line and fumbled it.

Gresham had passion with a football? maybe we should cut him that just weird

[XenoMorph]

Why are you guys talking about this the play never happened.