Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88
No, He did, He did, No, No.
Sorry. But you are flat wrong here.
Atkins should not have started. He was a HUGE liability vs the run.
Burfict did start as a rookie.
Robinson did start as a rookie.
Dunlap didn't deserve it. He was a liability. He didn't practice hard. He didn't earn it.
Sanu struggled with things and was given his chance. Got hurt.
|
Hmm.
Atkins is the best DT in the NFL. We had a 4-12 season. We should have had the stud on the field earlier. Maybe we wouldn't have been 4-12 if he played more. 3 sacks as a rookie with one start and not much playing time.
They were forced to play Burfict because of injury or else the team leader in tackles would not have had a starting job.
Robinson started after we lost our starter, and the old washed up vet we signed off the street and gave the job to got injured. Once again. He should have been on the field. Once the vet got healthy he was given the job back and the surging offense sank.
Dunlap had 9.5 sacks as a rookie. Yes he did deserve it.
After throwing a TD in week 3 Sanu didn't get a start until week 11 and proceeded to score 3 TDs in two starts. He was capable of making plays from day one and should have been more involved.
You sir are the one who is dead wrong.