Cincinnati Bengals

Go Back   Cincinnati Bengals Message Boards - Forums > Cincinnati Bengals Football Discussion > The NFL Draft

The NFL Draft The Bengals will have three of the first 56 selections in the 2013 NFL Draft. Discuss it all here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #76  
Old 02-26-2013, 02:34 AM
crazymad crazymad is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 261
Rep Points: 122
Default Re: Eddie Lacy..Bengals

Quote:
Originally Posted by savagehenry54 View Post
Well, there are a bunch of backs coming out that will probably immediately be more dynamic than Ellis is. So you and Ellis are going to both have to hope that the Bengals don't draft one of those guys. Even a second rounder would take his job imo.
i agree that there are alot of dynamic good backs and that the bengals need to take one. but not in the first or even at 2a, i like franklin and gio personally. but I almost guarantee BJGE is starting barring injury
Reply With Quote
  #77  
Old 02-26-2013, 03:07 AM
savagehenry54's Avatar
savagehenry54 savagehenry54 is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbus
Posts: 12,263
Rep Points: 31262
Default Re: Eddie Lacy..Bengals

Quote:
Originally Posted by crazymad View Post
i agree that there are alot of dynamic good backs and that the bengals need to take one. but not in the first or even at 2a, i like franklin and gio personally. but I almost guarantee BJGE is starting barring injury
You think more of Ellis than I do. I could even see a smartly targeted third or fourth rounder beating him out, he just does not impress me much at all.
Reply With Quote
  #78  
Old 02-26-2013, 03:12 AM
NATI BENGALS's Avatar
NATI BENGALS NATI BENGALS is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Posts: 3,545
Rep Points: 3855
Default Re: Eddie Lacy..Bengals

Quote:
Originally Posted by berserkerone88 View Post
No, He did, He did, No, No.

Sorry. But you are flat wrong here.
Atkins should not have started. He was a HUGE liability vs the run.
Burfict did start as a rookie.
Robinson did start as a rookie.
Dunlap didn't deserve it. He was a liability. He didn't practice hard. He didn't earn it.
Sanu struggled with things and was given his chance. Got hurt.
Hmm.

Atkins is the best DT in the NFL. We had a 4-12 season. We should have had the stud on the field earlier. Maybe we wouldn't have been 4-12 if he played more. 3 sacks as a rookie with one start and not much playing time.

They were forced to play Burfict because of injury or else the team leader in tackles would not have had a starting job.

Robinson started after we lost our starter, and the old washed up vet we signed off the street and gave the job to got injured. Once again. He should have been on the field. Once the vet got healthy he was given the job back and the surging offense sank.

Dunlap had 9.5 sacks as a rookie. Yes he did deserve it.

After throwing a TD in week 3 Sanu didn't get a start until week 11 and proceeded to score 3 TDs in two starts. He was capable of making plays from day one and should have been more involved.

You sir are the one who is dead wrong.

Last edited by NATI BENGALS; 02-26-2013 at 03:16 AM.
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:06 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2012 Cincinnati Bengals. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate in any form without permission of the Cincinnati Bengals.