Originally Posted by BengalRugby
I am not comparing one game to get the 2.4 yards, so please don't try and feign that "point." The article illustrates that the Bengals defense allows 2.4 yards less per play when Burfict is on the field. It did not state "games he starts" nor "games he played in," but simply the snaps he was on the field versus snaps he was not on the field....
If you want an outsider's point of view ... it seems like you two are having a fairly pointless argument. Both of you agree that Burfict was really good and a promising young player, but you're saying that means we shouldn't risk moving him while TheLeonardLeap is saying if he can do that at WLB imagine what he can do at MLB where he had more experience as a college player. Personally, I lean to the latter view ... IMO we should be giving Burfict a chance at MLB and only keeping him at WLB if he fails to win that job.