|
|||||||
| Jungle Noise Bengals Football Discussion for BENGALS FANS ONLY. Visiting team fans please keep your postings in one of our other forums. |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
#26
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Your opinion regarding Jeremi Johnson, is just an opinion. I saw Ickey Woods play as a rookie, and he was rarely a blocking back, although listed as FB. My comment is very relevant. If we had the talent at FB, he will be on the field. You should watch Leach play, and then express an opinion. |
|
#27
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
I've been watching him since he was Texan. Furthermore, the PB is a popularity contest, and Geno should've been an all-pro last year, so sorry, that "merit" is BS. I have written 3 posts since 2009 detailing his overratedness. And no, that's not my opinion re Jeremi. Unlike Neal as well, he could carry and had good hands. As well, Icley was a FB, whether he blocked or not. Its irrelevant to the conversation on what he did, what matters is his position. And I'm telling you that Pressley IS talent; we don't use it. Period. Last year he saw 19 snaps a game. He did very well. This year he's seeing 12 snaps a game. He's doing markedly worse. Leach gets more opportunities to succeed, thus he will succeed more often; law of averages.
__________________
![]() Soooooooooo much thanks to Cin for this incredible sig! CHILD PLEASE |
|
#28
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
|
|
#29
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Bring back Jourdan Brooks
Quote:
__________________
|
|
#30
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
Ickey was a RB, not a FB. He was listed his first year as a FB, when we already had Wilson as our designated FB. Woods also had more carries than our designated RB that year. But after that first year, he was designated correctly as RB. He was the power back. Pressley is not in the same class as Neal or Leach as a blocker. Pressley IS NOT talent. That is with a period and exclamation point. http://www.baltimoreravens.com/news/...a-efd9485c3481 http://thesteelersfans.com/forums/sh...mpton&p=107407 |
|
#31
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Furthermore, you don't like Pressley, cool. To say he's not talent is laughable, as the history has proven.
__________________
![]() Soooooooooo much thanks to Cin for this incredible sig! CHILD PLEASE |
|
#32
|
|||
|
|||
|
Quote:
You are saying that he is talent, and I am saying he is not. So we disagree. But to say that my opinion of him is "laughable, as history has proven" is unjustified, because, there is a lack of information from history, which proves it. His underutilization in a WC offense is more related to talent than scheme. If you look at Buccaneers 2002, 2003 and 2004 seasons, you will see the difference in FB utilization between '02 and '04 compared with '03. Alstott was the FB in '02 and '04, whereas Cook was the FB in '03. Same system, 2 different players. |
|
#33
|
|||
|
|||
|
Lol, my bad.
I got the two confused - I want that RB from TCU that we cut after training camp. Better option than Brooks. |
|
#34
|
||||
|
||||
|
I'm an OSU fan (well... a moderate one) and I didn't care for the Herron pick. However, it was the sixth round and I was ok with spending a sixth rounder on him. Not like a lot of sixth rounders make huge impacts. Here's to hoping though.
|
|
#35
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Bring back Jourdan Brooks
Quote:
I liked Brooks when he was here as well. Looked big and fast. I am not a Buckeye fan at all but calling out OSU fans is getting old around here IMO.
__________________
|
|
#36
|
||||
|
||||
|
Quote:
Now with that being said, obviously the coaches thought Herron was more prepared than Brooks. Brooks wasn't even on the practice squad. So that is really saying something. Now if front office wanted to bring Brooks back to the P.S., I would not oppose to that. But to this argument, Herron was the better choice. |
![]() |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|