Cincinnati Bengals

Go Back   Cincinnati Bengals Message Boards - Forums > Cincinnati Bengals Football Discussion > Smack Talk

Smack Talk Talk trash with fans from opposing teams. Have fun guys and gals, but keep it clean.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 03-29-2012, 10:50 AM
WhoDeyLeisure's Avatar
WhoDeyLeisure WhoDeyLeisure is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,573
Rep Points: 1423
Default Browns to take Tannehill

Ryan Tannehill is on the NFL.com homepage, and it says he has the raw skills to be a top 10 pick. That is all the Browns needed to hear. Another project QB? I believe that is too tempting for the Browns to pass up. I believe they are sold. They will waste another high pick, on another mediocre QB.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...module=HP11_cp

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Or just laugh at the lowly Browns.

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 03-29-2012, 12:15 PM
Trademark's Avatar
Trademark Trademark is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 1,903
Rep Points: 1103
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

don't really know who that is, but i hope some way Justin Blackmon drops to 17, i doubt it will happen but could you imagine Blackmon and Green together :O, i thought Browns would take Blackmon but if not that'd be awesome if we somehow got him, one can dream right?

Last edited by Trademark; 03-29-2012 at 01:06 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 03-29-2012, 12:34 PM
WhoDeyLeisure's Avatar
WhoDeyLeisure WhoDeyLeisure is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,573
Rep Points: 1423
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trademark View Post
..
Just like to see your post count get higher?
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 03-29-2012, 01:06 PM
Trademark's Avatar
Trademark Trademark is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Springfield, Ohio
Posts: 1,903
Rep Points: 1103
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

there i edited my post :)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 03-29-2012, 01:06 PM
Robbie Sharp Robbie Sharp is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
Posts: 5,194
Rep Points: 7530
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDeyLeisure View Post
Just like to see your post count get higher?
Hey, his post belongs in our "nothing" thread in Klotsch!
__________________
''Life's tough .......... it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
-- John Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 03-29-2012, 01:43 PM
Stewy's Avatar
Stewy Stewy is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Into the Void.......
Posts: 5,381
Rep Points: 23840
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Robbie Sharp View Post
Hey, his post belongs in our "nothing" thread in Klotsch!
lol Nice


Anyway back to the OP.

Tanneyhill worries me. He has "System QB Bust" written all over him.
__________________
cheers!

-Stewwy
---------------------------------------------------
ESPN has the journalistic integrity of a turnip!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 03-29-2012, 02:04 PM
WhoDeyLeisure's Avatar
WhoDeyLeisure WhoDeyLeisure is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 1,573
Rep Points: 1423
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Trademark View Post
there i edited my post :)
Don't know who Tannehill is????

My replied SHOULD be "..."


http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...headline_stack
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 03-29-2012, 06:47 PM
Woodley Woodley is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,416
Rep Points: 1697
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by WhoDeyLeisure View Post
Ryan Tannehill is on the NFL.com homepage, and it says he has the raw skills to be a top 10 pick. That is all the Browns needed to hear. Another project QB? I believe that is too tempting for the Browns to pass up. I believe they are sold. They will waste another high pick, on another mediocre QB.

http://www.nfl.com/draft/story/09000...module=HP11_cp

Be afraid, be very afraid.

Or just laugh at the lowly Browns.

Unwrap those Tootsie Rolls and you get something that looks like a turd. Classy uniform browns.





__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey513
anything you say is complete garbage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeegieThompson
Corey513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Stripes View Post
lame post by me tend to get stupid.

Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 03-29-2012, 07:44 PM
shaolinghost shaolinghost is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,324
Rep Points: 4076
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Tannehill at 4 is an absolutely stupid pick. Hell, the Dolphins taking him at 8 would still be pretty stupid. Colt McCoy just needs more weapons and I'm sure he'll at least be serviceable. Little didn't really impress his first year, and Massiquoi is mind-numbingly mediocre. Cribbs is decent, but he's much better as a return guy.

Give Colt some ammo(Blackmon, Richardson), and the offense should get the shot it needs to be at least decent.

Last edited by shaolinghost; 03-29-2012 at 07:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 03-29-2012, 10:29 PM
Robbie Sharp Robbie Sharp is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rochester, N.Y.
Posts: 5,194
Rep Points: 7530
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Speaking of the Browns, draft still nearly a month away and Bushy#2 has already went back into hiding, sad I tell you.
__________________
''Life's tough .......... it's even tougher if you're stupid.''
-- John Wayne
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 03-30-2012, 10:40 AM
Millz's Avatar
Millz Millz is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Ohio
Posts: 7,882
Rep Points: 14874
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Apparently Mayock thinks the Browns would be crazy to pass him up after observing him at his pro-day.

Should also be noted that Mayock, who many here have such high regard for, thought that Gabbert should have been taken number one over Cam after Gabbert's pro-day last year.
__________________


Football is a game of errors. The team that makes the fewest errors in a game usually wins. - Paul Brown
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 03-30-2012, 11:28 AM
Steeler Eater's Avatar
Steeler Eater Steeler Eater is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: I got this
Posts: 11,676
Rep Points: 15492
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Millz View Post
Apparently Mayock thinks the Browns would be crazy to pass him up after observing him at his pro-day.

Should also be noted that Mayock, who many here have such high regard for, thought that Gabbert should have been taken number one over Cam after Gabbert's pro-day last year.
Agreed. It's pretty sad when you get beaten out by Luke McCown or whoever the **** they had.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 03-30-2012, 12:29 PM
duke0476's Avatar
duke0476 duke0476 is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Ohio
Posts: 4,704
Rep Points: 8503
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaolinghost View Post
Tannehill at 4 is an absolutely stupid pick. Hell, the Dolphins taking him at 8 would still be pretty stupid. Colt McCoy just needs more weapons and I'm sure he'll at least be serviceable. Little didn't really impress his first year, and Massiquoi is mind-numbingly mediocre. Cribbs is decent, but he's much better as a return guy.

Give Colt some ammo(Blackmon, Richardson), and the offense should get the shot it needs to be at least decent.
This.

A team can get by with a mediocre QB for awhile. The Browns need to address RB, recievers and O-line before they can even begin to think about a franchise QB. Plus Tannehill is not going to be a franchise QB, he is a coin flip as a project as it is and to waste a pick at this stage is moronic.
__________________
"I believe the game is designed to reward the ones who hit the hardest. If you can't take it, you shouldn't play." Jack Lambert.

"The Steelers drafted guys who were bigger, stronger and faster than I, but they never found one who could take my job away from me." Jack Lambert
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 03-30-2012, 03:24 PM
Nately120's Avatar
Nately120 Nately120 is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: PA, of all places
Posts: 4,738
Rep Points: 5669
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

What is this, the 10th QB they've pointlessly thrown at their awful WR corps? Nice.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 03-31-2012, 12:12 AM
BigPapaKain's Avatar
BigPapaKain BigPapaKain is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Toledo, Ohio
Posts: 3,924
Rep Points: 5222
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Nately120 View Post
What is this, the 10th QB they've pointlessly thrown at their awful WR corps? Nice.
I think they're trying to set the record for most QB's broken over a 10 year span.
__________________
<-Football fans in the offseason

Vi veri universum vivus vici.
Reply With Quote
  #16  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:08 AM
neiser's Avatar
neiser neiser is offline
VIP Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: partyin w jerome
Posts: 708
Rep Points: 1115
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

i almost feel bad for browns fans......almost.
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 03-31-2012, 09:11 AM
Steeler Eater's Avatar
Steeler Eater Steeler Eater is offline
VIP Platinum Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: I got this
Posts: 11,676
Rep Points: 15492
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by BigPapaKain View Post
I think they're trying to set the record for most QB's broken over a 10 year span.
and the list goes on....

__________________
Reply With Quote
  #18  
Old 03-31-2012, 03:20 PM
Whatever Whatever is offline
VIP Gold Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 8,592
Rep Points: 20310
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by duke0476 View Post
This.

A team can get by with a mediocre QB for awhile. The Browns need to address RB, recievers and O-line before they can even begin to think about a franchise QB. Plus Tannehill is not going to be a franchise QB, he is a coin flip as a project as it is and to waste a pick at this stage is moronic.
I would agree. The problem with the Browns drafting a QB high is that they simply don't have enough pieces for the guy to succeed on his own merits. If they weren't sold on McCoy,they should have just brought in Orton or Campbell as a FA to compete for the job while they built their talent level through the draft,then moved on when the right guy was available.

The Browns are a perfect example of a bad organization that makes dumb decisions by trying to make moves that appeal to their fan base. They will sell the Browns backers that Tannehill is a franchise QB,and they will be dumb enough to buy it. Then,after Tannehill fails miserably,Shurmer will be out the door along with possibly Holmgren and they'll start all over again.
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 03-31-2012, 03:32 PM
Shere Khan's Avatar
Shere Khan Shere Khan is offline
VIP Silver Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: The Concrete Jungle
Posts: 2,968
Rep Points: 6214
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Hey now, I wouldn't go so far as to annoint Tannehill garbage or anything, but if the Browns are smart, they will allow Colt to play this year and give Ryan the opportunity to learn on the sidelines. Then, if Colt plays somewhat decent this year, they will be able to use him as trade bait in the future.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 04-01-2012, 09:56 AM
DWright's Avatar
DWright DWright is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 1,840
Rep Points: 1513
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

The Browns could pair up at #4 Justin Blackmon and at #37 Brandon Weeden lol. I like Weeden better than Tannehill anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #21  
Old 04-01-2012, 01:13 PM
shaolinghost shaolinghost is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,324
Rep Points: 4076
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by DWright View Post
The Browns could pair up at #4 Justin Blackmon and at #37 Brandon Weeden lol. I like Weeden better than Tannehill anyway.
You'd have to take Weeden at #22, or use that pick to trade down a few spots if you think the value isn't there. If Tannehill, RGIII, and Luck are all gone before pick 10, Weeden won't likely make it out of the first round.

Here's a quick draft that could get the browns goin:
1a. Blackmon
1b. Weeden(if they're not sold on McCoy)
2. L. Miller

Right there you've got a franchise WR, starting QB, and starting RB with more than enough big play ability.
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 04-01-2012, 08:16 PM
Woodley Woodley is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 3,416
Rep Points: 1697
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by duke0476 View Post
This.

A team can get by with a mediocre QB for awhile. The Browns need to address RB, recievers and O-line before they can even begin to think about a franchise QB. Plus Tannehill is not going to be a franchise QB, he is a coin flip as a project as it is and to waste a pick at this stage is moronic.
True, the Steelers won 2 Super Bowls with one.
__________________
_____________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corey513
anything you say is complete garbage
Quote:
Originally Posted by WeegieThompson
Corey513
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Stripes View Post
lame post by me tend to get stupid.


Last edited by Woodley; 04-01-2012 at 08:19 PM.
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 04-01-2012, 08:28 PM
Beaker's Avatar
Beaker Beaker is offline
MB HOF Inductee
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: An undisclosed biological research facility.
Posts: 19,328
Rep Points: 55750
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodley View Post
True, the Steelers won 2 Super Bowls with one.
They won one with him, the other one the refs gave them despite the wretched QB play of the steelers.
__________________
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 04-01-2012, 10:48 PM
shaolinghost shaolinghost is offline
Veteran Member
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 3,324
Rep Points: 4076
Default Re: Browns to take Tannehill

Quote:
Originally Posted by Woodley View Post
True, the Steelers won 2 Super Bowls with one.
They won 4 in the 70s with the same formula: mediocre QB, great defense...
Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:17 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.2
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright 1999-2012 Cincinnati Bengals. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate in any form without permission of the Cincinnati Bengals.